2016
DOI: 10.1161/circ.133.suppl_1.p093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract P093: Influence of Comorbidities on Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-based Case-control Study

Abstract: Background: Differences in the impact of comorbid conditions on outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients compared to population controls have not been well documented. Methods: The prevalence of 19 chronic conditions and smoking status was obtained in 1430 patients with incident AF from 2000-2010 and 1430 controls matched 1:1 on sex and age (within 5 years) from Olmsted County, MN. Andersen-Gill models determined associations of each condition with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, affecting over 30 million patients worldwide (1,2). Beyond the age of 40, ∼26% of men and 23% of women will develop AF (3,4), a diagnosis associated with elevated risk of cardioembolic stroke (5), reduced quality of life (4), and higher risk of heart failure (HF) related events (6)(7)(8)(9). Targeted efforts to develop and validate AF risk scores have been described (6,8,(10)(11)(12) leveraging data from healthy populations without cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, affecting over 30 million patients worldwide (1,2). Beyond the age of 40, ∼26% of men and 23% of women will develop AF (3,4), a diagnosis associated with elevated risk of cardioembolic stroke (5), reduced quality of life (4), and higher risk of heart failure (HF) related events (6)(7)(8)(9). Targeted efforts to develop and validate AF risk scores have been described (6,8,(10)(11)(12) leveraging data from healthy populations without cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%