2021
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnaa352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract-Induced Modules for Reductive Algebraic Groups With Frobenius Maps

Abstract: Let ${\textbf{G}}$ be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ of $q$ elements and $\textbf{B}$ be a Borel subgroup of ${\textbf{G}}$ defined over $\mathbb{F}_q$. Let $\mathbb{k}$ be a field and we assume that $\mathbb{k}=\bar{\mathbb{F}}_q $ when $\textrm{char}\ \mathbb{k}=\textrm{char} \ \mathbb{F}_q$. We show that the abstract-induced module $\mathbb{M}(\theta )=\mathbb{k}{\textbf{G}}\otimes _{\mathbb{k}\textbf{B}}\theta $ (here $\mathbb{k}\textbf{H}$ is the group alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof can be found in [5,Proposition 2.5]. For the convenience of later discussion, we give some details about the expression of the element ṡi u i ẇη(θ) J , where u i ∈ U αi \{id} (the neutral element of U) and w satisfies that ℓ(ww J ) = ℓ(w) + ℓ(w J ).…”
Section: Notation and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof can be found in [5,Proposition 2.5]. For the convenience of later discussion, we give some details about the expression of the element ṡi u i ẇη(θ) J , where u i ∈ U αi \{id} (the neutral element of U) and w satisfies that ℓ(ww J ) = ℓ(w) + ℓ(w J ).…”
Section: Notation and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) The above theorem is not true for general θ when F = k. However when F = k = Fq , Theorem 6.1 is also valid when θ is antidominant (see [5,Theorem 4.1]). Moreover, paper [5] has showed that M(θ) has such a composition series if and only if θ is antidominant (see [5,Theorem 5.1,5.2]). (b) When θ is trivial, we will prove that all the kG-modules E(tr) J (J ⊂ I) are irreducible in Section 7 (see Theorem 7.1).…”
Section: Principal Representation Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, motivated by Xi's idea, the structure of the permutation module k[G/B] (B is a fixed Borel subgroup of G ) was studied in [4] for the cross characteristic case and in [5] for the defining characteristic case. We studied the general abstract induced module M(θ) = kG ⊗ kB k θ in [6] for any field k with char k = char Fq or k = Fq , where T is a maximal torus contained in a Borel subgroup B and θ is a character of T which can also be regarded as a character of B through the homomorphism B → T. The induced module M(θ) has a composition series (of finite length) if char k = char Fq . In the case k = Fq and θ is a rational character, M(θ) has such composition series if and only if θ is antidominant (see [6] for details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied the general abstract induced module M(θ) = kG ⊗ kB k θ in [6] for any field k with char k = char Fq or k = Fq , where T is a maximal torus contained in a Borel subgroup B and θ is a character of T which can also be regarded as a character of B through the homomorphism B → T. The induced module M(θ) has a composition series (of finite length) if char k = char Fq . In the case k = Fq and θ is a rational character, M(θ) has such composition series if and only if θ is antidominant (see [6] for details). In both cases, the composition factors of M(θ) are E(θ) J with J ⊂ I(θ) (see Section 2 for the explicit setting).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%