2017
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-ct022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract CT022: Evaluation of oral microbiome profiling as a response biomarker in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Analyses from CheckMate 141

Abstract: Introduction: Recent studies indicated that specific intestinal microbiota may modulate efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy in preclinical tumor models (Sivan et al, Science. 2015;350:1084-9; Vétizou et al, Science. 2015;350:1079-84). However, little is known regarding the association of the oral microbiome with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. In CheckMate 141 (NCT02105636), a randomized global phase 3 study comparing nivolumab with investigator’s choice (IC) therapy in patients with platinu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, patients who responded to therapy harbored gut microbiota with greater diversity, particularly greater amounts of clostridia bacterium, and tumors from these responding patients showed significantly increased immune infiltrates. In contrast, among saliva samples analyzed from patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck, no significant associations were detected among bacterial diversity with best overall response, tumor PD-L1 expression, or HPV16 status (46). These findings underscore the importance of taking both the tumor and host factors into consideration in the search for biomarkers(47), with further studies needed to determine the relevance of the immiune microbiome in predicting toxicity from and response to immunotherapy.…”
Section: An Understanding Of the Challenges And Limitations Unique Tomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, patients who responded to therapy harbored gut microbiota with greater diversity, particularly greater amounts of clostridia bacterium, and tumors from these responding patients showed significantly increased immune infiltrates. In contrast, among saliva samples analyzed from patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck, no significant associations were detected among bacterial diversity with best overall response, tumor PD-L1 expression, or HPV16 status (46). These findings underscore the importance of taking both the tumor and host factors into consideration in the search for biomarkers(47), with further studies needed to determine the relevance of the immiune microbiome in predicting toxicity from and response to immunotherapy.…”
Section: An Understanding Of the Challenges And Limitations Unique Tomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Retrospective analysis from a noncontrolled cohort [73]. Microbiota16S rRNA high throughput sequencing of saliva and stoolOral microbiota: nonpredictiveIntestinal microbiota: no data yetRetrospective analysis of prospective randomized clinical trial [133]. aPredictive values in HPV – and HPV + subgroups were defined positive or negative if a statistically significant correlation between response and the immune biomarker was described in the referenced studies; uncertain if no significant correlation was found; no data if no studies had evaluated the role of the biomarker in this setting at the time of this publication.bThe positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and treatment response was not consistent across the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the microbiota has a role in predicting response to immunotherapy in HNSCC is yet to be determined. Only one substudy from CHECKMATE-141 explored the role of the oral microbiota measured in the saliva as a predictive biomarker in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab, showing no significant correlation with treatment efficacy or survival [9, 133]. However, the study had several limitations, including the lack of uniformity in sample collection, the small number of responses for correlation and importantly, the omission of intestinal microbiota.…”
Section: Introducing the Microbiota As A Potential Immune Biomarker Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in melanoma patients whose baseline microbiota was enriched with Faecalibacterium genus and other Firmicutes showed a longer PFS and OS than those whose baseline microbiota was enriched with Bacteroides upon ipilimumab treatment 145 . One substudy from the Checkmate‐141 trial, however, explored the oral microbiota as a predictive biomarker in patients with advanced SCC of the head and neck treated with nivolumab and reported no significant correlation with treatment efficacy or survival 146 . Recent studies have also suggested that the immune microbiome plays a role in the development of toxicity 147–149 .…”
Section: Novel Ici Approaches To Precision Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%