2016
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6074.cricimteatiaacr15-a114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract A114: Towards personalized cellular adoptive immunotherapy targeting tumor specific neo-antigens in microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers

Abstract: Colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI-CRCs) represent 15% of all CRCs, including Lynch syndrome, the most frequent hereditary form of this disease. Notably, MSI-CRCs have a higher density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) than other CRCs. This feature is thought to reflect an accumulation of frameshift mutations in coding repeat sequences, leading to the synthesis of neo-antigens, expressed only by tumor cells and presented at their cell surface on HLA class I molecules, as immunogenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of TILs is considered a robust marker (8). Although the immunoscore was originally developed for assessment in whole tissue sections, strong correlations between the density of TILs observed in TMAs versus whole tissue sections has been reported in several studies, supporting the use of TMAs to evaluate TIL densities (7,33,34). PD-L1 can be heterogeneously expressed, and it was assessed in TMAs only in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The density of TILs is considered a robust marker (8). Although the immunoscore was originally developed for assessment in whole tissue sections, strong correlations between the density of TILs observed in TMAs versus whole tissue sections has been reported in several studies, supporting the use of TMAs to evaluate TIL densities (7,33,34). PD-L1 can be heterogeneously expressed, and it was assessed in TMAs only in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%