2013
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract 4130: Detection of FGFR1 and FGFR2 amplification in triple-negative breast cancer using digital droplet PCR and DNA-based microarrays.

Abstract: Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) lack targeted therapeutic strategies and identification of potential oncogenic targets is imperative. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathway has been implicated in mammary tumorigenesis and is a potential target in TNBC. Amplification of FGFR2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2), identified using genomic studies, has been reported in 4% of TNBCs. Selective FGFR inhibitors are in clinical development and patient selection for these trials is important. Preclin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng et al suggested that upregulation of FGFR1 expression in TNBC cells may be treated as a potential therapeutic target ( Cheng et al, 2015 ). Vinayak et al (2013) reported that FGF pathways have been implicated in breast tumorigenesis as a potential target for TNBC. In addition, there is some research indicating that it is related to breast cancer, as FGFR1 was found to be associated with luminal A breast cancer ( Zou et al, 2016a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et al suggested that upregulation of FGFR1 expression in TNBC cells may be treated as a potential therapeutic target ( Cheng et al, 2015 ). Vinayak et al (2013) reported that FGF pathways have been implicated in breast tumorigenesis as a potential target for TNBC. In addition, there is some research indicating that it is related to breast cancer, as FGFR1 was found to be associated with luminal A breast cancer ( Zou et al, 2016a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%