Abstract 2968: Exome sequencing of desmoplastic melanoma reveals recurrent NFKBIE promoter mutations and diverse MAPK/PI3K pathway activating mutations

Abstract

Desmoplastic melanomas (DMs) comprise 4% of the overall melanoma burden and have a 5-year survival rate of 85%. DMs are dermal tumors characterized by spindled melanocytes situated within abundant desomplastic stroma. These unusual histological features commonly lead to misdiagnosis. Currently, there are no known genetic drivers. A better understanding of the underlying biology of desmoplastic melanoma would provide biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities. Towards this goal, we performed low-coverage genome and high-coverage exome sequencing of 20 DMs in a discovery cohort, followed by targeted sequencing of 293 candidate genes on a validation cohort of 42 cases. Additionally, high-resolution aCGH was performed on samples from both cohorts. A high mutation burden (median 62 mutations/Mb) ranked desmoplastic melanoma among the most highly mutated cancers sequenced to date. Mutation patterns strongly indicate that UV-radiation is the dominant mutagen and implicate a superficially located cell of origin despite their predominantly intradermal presentation. Novel alterations included recurrent promoter mutations and amplification of NF-kappa B inhibitor epsilon, NFKBIE (IkBϵ) in 14.5% of samples. The promoter mutations typically affect both alleles and occur over a highly conserved DNA region. The mutations are predicted to disrupt a canonical Ets Like Factor 1 (ELF1) binding site. In total, these data imply aberrant NF-kappa B signaling as a pathogenic feature of desmoplastic melanoma. Commonly mutated oncogenes in melanomas, in particular BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61K/R, were absent. Instead, other genetic alterations known to activate the MAPK and PI3K signaling cascades were identified in 73% of samples, affecting NF1, CBL, ERBB2, MAP2K1, MAP3K1, BRAF, EGFR, PTPN11, MET, RAC1, SOS2, NRAS, and PIK3CA. Rb and p53 pathway alterations occurred respectively in 71% and 66% of tumors, affecting RB1, FBXW7, CDK4, PPP6C, CCND1, CDKN2A, TP53, and MDM2. Finally, TERT promoter mutations or amplifications occurred in 90% of tumors. The consequences of the mutations on protein expression levels was confirmed by immunostaining for NF1, EGFR, Rb, CDK4, CCND1, p16, p53, and Mdm2. Collectively, many of these oncogenic mutations are potentially druggable. In conclusion, desmoplastic melanomas harbor distinct genetic alterations that explain their unique biology, and this study illuminates genetic biomarkers and nominates targets for therapeutic intervention. Citation Format: Alan H. Shain, Maria Garrido, Thomas Botton, Eric Talevich, Iweh Yeh, Zack Sanborn, Jongsuk Chung, Nicholas Wang, Hojabr Kakavand, Graham Mann, John Thompson, Thomas Wiesner, Ritu Roy, Adam Olshen, Alexander Gagnon, Joe Gray, Nam Huh, Joe Hur, Klaus Busam, Richard Scolyer, Raymond Cho, Rajmohan Murali, Boris Bastian. Exome sequencing of desmoplastic melanoma reveals recurrent NFKBIE promoter mutations and diverse MAPK/PI3K pathway activating mutations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2968. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2968

The landscape of driver mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

“…Genes under positive selection in cancer are distinguished by having significantly more mutations than the background mutation rate at that locus would predict 33 . We utilized four cancer gene discovery tools to reveal such genes: MutSig 14 , dN/ dS 34 , LOFsigrank 35 , and OncodriveFML 36 . Collectively, these tools nominated 12 genes total, including a subset of 7 genes by at least 2 tools (Fig.…”

“…Promoter mutations are ubiquitous in sun-exposed cancers 42,43 because transcription factors at the promoter can bend DNA in ways that render their binding elements vulnerable to mutagenesis by UV radiation 44 . These types of annotation errors are not uncommon-many hotspot mutations in melanoma, which were initially thought to be coding mutations, were subsequently revealed to be promoter mutations after further studies 20,35,45 . There is a study suggesting KNSTRN S24F is oncogenic 46 , but the supporting evidence presumes the mutation is coding.…”

“…We used four cancer gene discovery programs to nominate cancer genes: MutSig 14 , LOFsigrank 35 , dN/dS 34 , and OncodriveFML 36 . dN/dS was run in covariate value mode, which combines the synonymous mutations in a gene with its epigenomic covariates to determine the background mutation rate.…”