2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1755-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstinence-dependent transfer of lithium chloride-induced sucrose aversion to a sucrose-paired cue in rats

Abstract: Rationale-Responding for a drug-or sucrose-paired cue increases over forced abstinence (incubation of craving). If the incentive value of a cue depends on the incentive value of the primary reward, devaluing the primary reward should reduce cue reactivity.Objectives-We investigated whether conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to sucrose would transfer to a sucrose-paired cue after 1 or 30 days of forced abstinence and whether CTA after 1 day of forced abstinence would affect incubation of craving.Materials and met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed increases in both sucrose cue-reactivity and sucrose consumption after a 30-day period of forced abstinence, similar to previous reports of incubated responding and consumption (Harkness, Webb, & Grimm, 2010; Grimm et al, 2013). In contrast to context extinction, sucrose satiation did not reduce cue-reactivity when rats were provided sucrose in either home cages or operant conditioning chambers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We also observed increases in both sucrose cue-reactivity and sucrose consumption after a 30-day period of forced abstinence, similar to previous reports of incubated responding and consumption (Harkness, Webb, & Grimm, 2010; Grimm et al, 2013). In contrast to context extinction, sucrose satiation did not reduce cue-reactivity when rats were provided sucrose in either home cages or operant conditioning chambers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This “incubation of craving” effect was similar to our previously published studies (e.g., Grimm et al 2008; Harkness et al 2009). When administered systemically, 1 and 5 µg/kg doses of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 only reduced cue reactivity in rats after 1 vs. 30 days into forced abstinence from sucrose self-administration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This type of responding is less flexible in many ways, including that it is less susceptible to revaluation of the primary reinforcement contingency (Holland et al 2008). This effect may be related to the incubation of sucrose seeking as we recently found that revaluation of a sucrose-paired cue was abstinence dependent (Harkness et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the history effect were to be maintained in both of these comparisons, it might then be concluded that experience of DAD 2 antagonism during Extinction literally transferred to food pellets, devaluing their incentive value. Such transfer effects between primary and secondary reinforcers have been reported previously (Harkness et al, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%