2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption of crystalline water ice in the far infrared at different temperatures

Abstract: The optical properties of ice in the far infrared are important for models of protoplanetary and debris disks. In this report, we derive a new set of data for the absorption (represented by the imaginary part of the refractive index κ) of crystalline water ice in this spectral range. The study includes a detailed inspection of the temperature dependence, which has not been conducted in such detail before. We measured the transmission of three ice layers with different thicknesses at temperatures ϑ = 10 . . . 2… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the direct observation of a spatially resolved inner radius of the debris disk system is limited by the fixed occulting spot size, for instance, 0.6" in HST observation. Alternatively, the analysis of debris disks SEDs allows constraining the inner radius as well, but is limited [0.1 µm, 1000 µm] with n(a) ∝ a −3.5 (Dohnanyi 1969) Dust composition and Amorphous ice (Potapov et al 2018b, Curtis et al 2005, and Li & Greenberg 1998) References of corresponding optical data Crystalline ice (Reinert et al 2015, Häßner et al 2018, Mishima et al 1983, Potapov et al 2018b, Warren 1984, Curtis et al 2005, and Li & Greenberg 1998 Astrosil (Draine 2003) Fractional ratio of ice F ice in icy dust mixtures 0 (pure Astrosil), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 (pure ice) Porosity of grains P 0 (compact), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 Sublimation temperature 100 K: Pure amorphous ice (Brown et al 2006;Kobayashi et al 2010) 105 K: Pure crystalline ice 100 K: Amorphous ice in dust aggregates 105 K: Crystalline ice in dust aggregates Table 1. Model parameters for the simulation of our reference debris disk model.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the direct observation of a spatially resolved inner radius of the debris disk system is limited by the fixed occulting spot size, for instance, 0.6" in HST observation. Alternatively, the analysis of debris disks SEDs allows constraining the inner radius as well, but is limited [0.1 µm, 1000 µm] with n(a) ∝ a −3.5 (Dohnanyi 1969) Dust composition and Amorphous ice (Potapov et al 2018b, Curtis et al 2005, and Li & Greenberg 1998) References of corresponding optical data Crystalline ice (Reinert et al 2015, Häßner et al 2018, Mishima et al 1983, Potapov et al 2018b, Warren 1984, Curtis et al 2005, and Li & Greenberg 1998 Astrosil (Draine 2003) Fractional ratio of ice F ice in icy dust mixtures 0 (pure Astrosil), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 (pure ice) Porosity of grains P 0 (compact), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 Sublimation temperature 100 K: Pure amorphous ice (Brown et al 2006;Kobayashi et al 2010) 105 K: Pure crystalline ice 100 K: Amorphous ice in dust aggregates 105 K: Crystalline ice in dust aggregates Table 1. Model parameters for the simulation of our reference debris disk model.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishima et al 1983) but only recent observations at higher resolution and sensitivity have brought the issue back into focus. Consequently, temperature-dependent data for more and more materials are becoming available (Reinert et al 2015;Häßner et al 2018;Mutschke & Mohr 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of five different materials is assumed: compact astronomical silicate (Draine 2006) with assumed bulk density ρ = 3.3 g/cm 3 , porous astronomical silicate (mixing rule: Bruggeman 1935) with a filling factor f = 10 % and ρ = 0.33 g/cm 3 , amorphous carbon (Zubko et al 1996) with ρ = 2 g/cm 3 , pyroxene (H. Mutschke and P. Mohr, private comm., manuscript in preparation) with ρ = 3.3 g/cm 3 , and crystalline water ice (Reinert et al 2015) with ρ = 1.0 g/cm 3 . Only the data sets for the latter two materials include a dependence on grain temperature.…”
Section: Materials and Range Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional uncertainties come from (unknown) porosity of grains (Henning & Stognienko 1996), as well as from the temperature dependence of the opacity. For all of the materials listed above, opacity tends to decrease toward lower temperatures (Reinert et al 2015;Häßner et al 2018;Potapov et al 2018;Mutschke & Mohr 2019, H. Mutschke & P. Mohr, in prep. ).…”
Section: Uncertainty In the Dust Mass?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since we do not know what the composition of debris dust looks like in reality, we can invoke results of laboratory measurements with THz techniques performed for some materials of potential astrophysical relevance. As an example, we consider crystalline water ice (Reinert et al 2015), forsterite (Mutschke & Mohr 2019), pyroxene (H. Mutschke & P. Mohr, in prep. ), and amorphous carbon (Zubko et al 1996).…”
Section: Uncertainty In the Dust Mass?mentioning
confidence: 99%