1979
DOI: 10.1136/adc.54.5.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption of chlorhexidine from the intact skin of newborn infants.

Abstract: SUMMARY 34 newborn infants who had been bathed in a standard manner with Hibiscrub* were studied to find out whether it was absorbed percutaneously. Low levels of chlorhexidine were found in the blood of all 10 babies sampled by heel prick, and 5 of 24 from whom venous blood was taken. The detection of chlorhexidine varied greatly with the method and timing of sampling, and no correlation was found between gestational or postnatal age and chlorhexidine levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have also shown cutaneous absorption of CHG in neonates. [27][28][29] The concentration of CHG found in the blood of enrolled neonates was similar to what others report. 29 Although the study was not designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of cutaneously absorbed CHG, at least two infant appeared to have increasing concentrations following each application suggesting accumulation through increased absorption or reduced metabolism and excretion of CHG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Others have also shown cutaneous absorption of CHG in neonates. [27][28][29] The concentration of CHG found in the blood of enrolled neonates was similar to what others report. 29 Although the study was not designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of cutaneously absorbed CHG, at least two infant appeared to have increasing concentrations following each application suggesting accumulation through increased absorption or reduced metabolism and excretion of CHG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…23 Contact dermatitis has not been reported in infants receiving full-body CHG skin cleansing when occlusive dressings were not necessary, even for very low birth weight infants and neonates as young as 28 weeks gestational age. 8 Alcohol-based CHG preparations have been reported to cause burns in infants 24 to 26 weeks gestational age. 20,24 -26 Alcohol alone is a known cause of skin burns in preterm infants, 27 therefore the impact of CHG as the trigger of skin breakdown in alcohol-based CHG preparations is unknown.…”
Section: Use Of Chg In Neonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited data addressing the potential for chlorhexidine absorption following topical application in preterm infants, especially in those <32 weeks gestation in the first 2 weeks of life. Three studies have reported detectable chlorhexidine concentrations in the blood of preterm infants <32 weeks gestation after skin exposure to CHG. [7][8][9] In a study by Cowen et al in 1979, blood samples were taken from 34 infants after whole body bathing with Hibiscrub (Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweeden), a 4% CHG aqueous solution not marketed in the United States, to determine if chlorhexidine was absorbed percutaneously. 8 Infants were bathed once daily by applying Hibiscrub to the whole body except the face and then washing the Hibiscrub off with plain water.…”
Section: Potential Absorption Of Chgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blood and tissue levels indicated that little systemic absorption had occurred, with only one blood sample having the minimum detectable concentration (11 ng.mL -1 ) at the time. Heel prick and venipuncture were then used to assess the potential systemic exposure to CHG in 34 (28-39 wk GA) newborn infants [80].…”
Section: Unwanted Skin Absorption and Potential For Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%