2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40857-020-00176-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption Coefficient of a Double-Layer Inhomogeneous Micro-perforated Panel Backed with Multiple Cavity Depths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under normal incident sound waves, the main mode of air pressure transfer through lattices will be from the pore connections from the top cell to the bottom cell. [ 21 ] Lateral pore connections can essentially be neglected for airflow. As such, the FCC‐plate unit cell can be simplified into an octahedral cavity with perforations interconnecting the adjacent cells (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal incident sound waves, the main mode of air pressure transfer through lattices will be from the pore connections from the top cell to the bottom cell. [ 21 ] Lateral pore connections can essentially be neglected for airflow. As such, the FCC‐plate unit cell can be simplified into an octahedral cavity with perforations interconnecting the adjacent cells (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prototype 1, consisting of one layer composed of four different MPPs facing different cavities, showed a wider absorption bandwidth in the low-mid frequency spectrum (α ≥ 0.5 from 300 to 1250 Hz). Despite some discrepancies, which literature has shown to be quite common in those complex structures [49,50,59], the results indicate a broadening of the absorption coefficient curve because of the multiple resonance peaks each panel introduces. Prototype 2 was composed of two layers having different parallel-arranged MPPs cascaded one after the other, with a distance (D1) in between and various partitioned cavities (D2) after the second layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These structures can be an alternative to conventional absorbing materials in architectural applications to attenuate a broader range of frequencies. Many studies [47,49,50,59] have investigated different combinations to address the narrow bandwidth of MPPs, but to the authors' knowledge, none have continued to assess the performance of those materials in architectural applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disadvantage of this type of sound absorber is the narrow frequency range of absorption. Due to an increase in the frequency range of absorption, some suggestions have been proposed such as the use of multilayered MPPs in succession [23][24][25][26][27] and the use of porous material behind the MPP [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%