1934
DOI: 10.1002/recl.19340531202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption and adsorption of hydrogen by Nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1943
1943
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictions become much more accurate at higher temperatures (>1000 K), where the dilute solution assumption is more likely to be fulfilled (Figures (a), (b), (c), and (d)). Among the FCC metals, the experimental data on the hydrogen solubility in Ni, , Cu, and Ag match the solubilities predicted for the O-site binding within a factor of 3 (Figures (e), (h), and (i)). Larger deviations from experiments were observed in the cases of Pd, , Pt, and Au , (Figures (f), (g), and (j)), which will be further discussed at the end of this section and in the following section.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The predictions become much more accurate at higher temperatures (>1000 K), where the dilute solution assumption is more likely to be fulfilled (Figures (a), (b), (c), and (d)). Among the FCC metals, the experimental data on the hydrogen solubility in Ni, , Cu, and Ag match the solubilities predicted for the O-site binding within a factor of 3 (Figures (e), (h), and (i)). Larger deviations from experiments were observed in the cases of Pd, , Pt, and Au , (Figures (f), (g), and (j)), which will be further discussed at the end of this section and in the following section.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The model could reproduce satisfactorily the available isobaric and isothermal solubility measurements in the whole pressure range from very low (1 to 240 Pa) (Figure ) to moderate pressures (10 5 and 10 7 Pa) (Figure ). It can be noted that the present model underestimates the solubility measurements of Smittenberg . This discrepancy was already pointed out by Zeng and explained by experimental inaccuracies on the pressure, for which the value may be slightly higher than 13.3 Pa.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…It can be noted that the present model underestimates the solubility measurements of Smittenberg. 59 This discrepancy was already pointed out by Zeng and explained by experimental inaccuracies on the pressure, which value may be slightly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 …”
Section: Calphad Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations