2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-019-1770-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorbing boundary condition (ABC) and perfectly matched layer (PML) in numerical beam propagation: a comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both these affect the wave propagating through structure such that the field in the layer is attenuated avoiding significant reflections. In an earlier work, we had shown that the PML and the gradual ABC compare well in their performance and in some cases PML is better than the ABC while in some other cases the ABC is better than the PML (Kumar and Sharma 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both these affect the wave propagating through structure such that the field in the layer is attenuated avoiding significant reflections. In an earlier work, we had shown that the PML and the gradual ABC compare well in their performance and in some cases PML is better than the ABC while in some other cases the ABC is better than the PML (Kumar and Sharma 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In order to suppress these unwanted reflections from the numerical boundaries, various boundary conditions have been devised: absorption boundary condition (ABC) (Mur 1981;Yevick and Jun 1994;Vasallo and Collino 1996;Koshiba and Tsuji 2001;Kumar and Sharma 2019), transparent boundary condition (TBC) (Hadley 1991(Hadley ,1992a and the perfectly matched layer boundary condition(PML) (Berenger 1994;Chew and Weedon 1994). Each one has some advantages and some limitations which have been discussed elsewhere (Jimenez and Perez-Murano 2001;Kumar and Sharma 2019). These boundary conditions are in the form of a layer next to the numerical boundary, in which the wave is attenuated in a suitable manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step size for numerical propagation was taken as 0.04µm, since the propagation is unaffected by further reduction in the step size. A gradually absorbing boundary condition (gABC) was implemented, which has been shown to be comparable to PML [39]. The gABC strength for a width of 40% was taken to be 0.89 with a sin 2 profile [39].…”
Section: Three Core Photonic Lanternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gradually absorbing boundary condition (gABC) was implemented, which has been shown to be comparable to PML [39]. The gABC strength for a width of 40% was taken to be 0.89 with a sin 2 profile [39]. The gABC parameters are optimized and its effect on the propagation can be considered to be similar for both the cases.…”
Section: Three Core Photonic Lanternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, researchers have constructed, studied, and compared the applicability and effectiveness of ABCs for problems arising in areas such as acoustics, geophysics, fluid dynamics, materials science, meteorology, antennas, seepage, and heat transfer problems. [9–34] Often, the necessity of using ABCs occurs in nonlinear optics and laser physics, and these fields of modern physics are extensively studied because of their widespread laser application [35–39]. In this regard, the development of ABCs for linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations is a meaningful task that has attracted the attention of numerous scientists [40–61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%