Cancer Imaging 2008
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012374212-4.50055-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorbed Dose Measurement in Mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,11 In some studies, heterogeneity of breast tissue has been considered. [14][15][16][17] The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the presence of breast cysts to DgN with changes in the thickness, the glandular composition of the breast tissue and the voltage of the X-ray tube. Finally, the results will be compared with the situation where homogeneous breast tissue is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,11 In some studies, heterogeneity of breast tissue has been considered. [14][15][16][17] The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the presence of breast cysts to DgN with changes in the thickness, the glandular composition of the breast tissue and the voltage of the X-ray tube. Finally, the results will be compared with the situation where homogeneous breast tissue is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image quality was assessed by using performance breast phantom. The entrance exposure was converted to the average glandular dose (AGD) according to the used protocol (Perry et al, 2006;IAEA, 2007, Marianne et al, 2008Baoying at al., 2012). Patients average glandular dose per exposure were calculated according to equation 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%