2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorbed dose, equivalent dose, measured dose rates, and implications for OSL age estimates: Introducing the Average Dose Model

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample was processed at the Nordic Center for Luminescence Dating (Risöe, Denmark). Additional details on the sample processing and analytical characteristics are reported in the supporting information (section S1a; Guérin et al, 2012Guérin et al, , 2017Guérin, Mercier, & Adamiec, 2011;Hansen et al, 2015;Murray, 1996;Murray et al, 1987Murray et al, , 2012Murray & Wintle, 2000, 2003Prescott & Hutton, 1994;Thomsen et al, 2016). Three higher surfaces were sampled for dating using in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes ( 10 Be and 26 Al).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was processed at the Nordic Center for Luminescence Dating (Risöe, Denmark). Additional details on the sample processing and analytical characteristics are reported in the supporting information (section S1a; Guérin et al, 2012Guérin et al, , 2017Guérin, Mercier, & Adamiec, 2011;Hansen et al, 2015;Murray, 1996;Murray et al, 1987Murray et al, , 2012Murray & Wintle, 2000, 2003Prescott & Hutton, 1994;Thomsen et al, 2016). Three higher surfaces were sampled for dating using in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes ( 10 Be and 26 Al).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arithmetic mean of the equivalent dose for each sample was used for age calculation, based on the assumption of effective bleaching during aeolian sedimentation (sample L17051 excepted) and a uniform radiation field within the homogeneous sediments yielding Gaussian dose distributions (Bailey & Arnold ; Guérin et al . ). Statistical values, such as skewness, support this assumption for the majority of samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S3.5). Different permutations of the assimilation of equivalent doses to obtain the burial dose were considered, including weighted combinations and statistical dose models 40 .…”
Section: Osl Dating Of Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%