2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00102-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute values of neutrino masses: status and prospects

Abstract: Compelling evidences in favor of neutrino masses and mixing obtained in the last years in Super-Kamiokande, SNO, KamLAND and other neutrino experiments made the physics of massive and mixed neutrinos a frontier field of research in particle physics and astrophysics. There are many open problems in this new field. In this review we consider the problem of the absolute values of neutrino masses, which apparently is the most difficult one from the experimental point of view. We discuss the present limits and the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
171
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 309 publications
7
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain the correct values for the tau and top masses, we expect h 1 ∼ 0.1, g ∼ 1 and u 2 ∼ 100 GeV. Since F B ≃ M U /(4π) 2 , the mass of the light neutrino is then O (0.1 eV), consistent with the experimental constraints [4]. There is also a one-loop diagram that couples ν to N 1,2 but with the heavy B quark replaced by d. This diagram is comparable to the tree-level Dirac mass h 1 u 2 , so it does not qualitatively change the radiative see-saw mechanism.…”
Section: Minimal Trinificationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In order to obtain the correct values for the tau and top masses, we expect h 1 ∼ 0.1, g ∼ 1 and u 2 ∼ 100 GeV. Since F B ≃ M U /(4π) 2 , the mass of the light neutrino is then O (0.1 eV), consistent with the experimental constraints [4]. There is also a one-loop diagram that couples ν to N 1,2 but with the heavy B quark replaced by d. This diagram is comparable to the tree-level Dirac mass h 1 u 2 , so it does not qualitatively change the radiative see-saw mechanism.…”
Section: Minimal Trinificationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Indeed, the allowed values of m ββ are well below the 0νββ bounds in Eq. (13). Note that, in the right panel, there is no region allowed at 2σ, since the the global ∆χ 2 IO−NO exceeds 4 units.…”
Section: Combined Constraints In the (σ M ββ ) Planementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the left panel, both the NO and the IO allowed bands are horizontally cut at the m ββ values in Eq. (13). In the right panel, the upper bounds on m ββ are stronger in IO, and can be estimated by drawing in Fig.…”
Section: Combined Constraints In the (σ M ββ ) Planementioning
confidence: 95%
“…(4.20) and (4.21) with ∆m 2 kj = ∆m 2 (∆m 2 is the squared-mass difference and ϑ is the mixing angle; see the reviews in Refs. [12,41,52,13]). An incoherent average of the probability in the plane-wave approximation over a gaussian energy spectrum with width σ E reads…”
Section: Stationary Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%