Radical reactions have gained increasing importance over the past decades in several fields of chemistry and biology, and the measurement of their rates is of great importance both for theoretical and practical purposes. 1 Several direct and indirect methods have been devised for the determination of radical kinetic parameters. Although, in principle, experimental techniques based on the time-resolved detection of the reacting species are more reliable, indirect measurements may become the method of choice in several cases either for the lack of suitable direct techniques or simply because they allow accurate measurements to be made even when expensive and sophisticated instrumentation is not available.A very popular indirect method makes use of competing unimolecular radical reactions as timing devices to investigate the rates of radical-molecule reactions. In this method, called the "radical clock" technique, 2 a unimolecular rearrangement whose kinetic parameters are well-known is set to compete with the bimolecular reaction to be calibrated, as shown in Scheme 1.The ratio, k A /k r , of the rate for reaction of the unrearranged radical U • with the atom donating substrate AB over the known rate for rearrangement to R • can be easily obtained from the analysis of the reaction products ([UA]/ [RA]). This method has proven to be especially valuable in the case of the hydrogen atom abstraction by alkyl radicals from any hydrogen-donating substrate (eq 1).A convenient timing device should satisfy the following requirements: (i) the alkyl radical should be easily generated from a suitable precursor directly in the reaction mixture; (ii) the rate of radical rearrangement should be accurately known and comparable to the pseudo-first-order rate of the bimolecular reaction to be timed, to simultaneously detect products arising from both competing reactions; (iii) the overall system should be sufficiently simple to be represented by Scheme 1; that is, no reaction other than hydrogen abstraction and the unimolecular rearrangement should take place in the same time scale; and (iv) the reaction products should be stable and detectable by means of a simple analytical method such as gas chromatography. Several radical rearrangements, complying with the above requirements, have been studied over the past few years. The slower ones, for which accurate calibrations have been reported over a wide range of temperatures, are collected in Chart 1.It can be seen that no radical clock, rearranging at room temperature with a rate constant in the range between 10 3 s -1 (neophyl and cyclobutylmethyl radicals) and 10 5 s -1 (1-hexenyl radical), is available for common laboratory practice, thus leaving uncovered a gap of 2 orders of magnitude. Incidentally, several substrates of wide interest, such as phenols, react with alkyl radicals with rates that, to be accurately measured, would require a unimolecular competing process falling in this range. 6 On the basis of EPR measurements, Maillard and Ingold 7 estimated that the neophyl-like...