1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)84508-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute quantitative electron microscopy of thin biological specimens by energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis and densitometric mass determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Procedures for mass determination by measurement of the transmission of the total electron beam have been described in detail by Halloran et al (1978), Pozsgai 8z Barna (1983) and Linders et al (1982Linders et al ( ,1984. Similar procedures based on measurement of the attenuation of the zero-loss peak in the electron energy-loss spectrum have been described by Leapman et al (1984) and Hosoi et al (198 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures for mass determination by measurement of the transmission of the total electron beam have been described in detail by Halloran et al (1978), Pozsgai 8z Barna (1983) and Linders et al (1982Linders et al ( ,1984. Similar procedures based on measurement of the attenuation of the zero-loss peak in the electron energy-loss spectrum have been described by Leapman et al (1984) and Hosoi et al (198 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is we11 known that in electron microscopy the contrast is related to the mass distribution in the specimen. Originally, the mass thickness was determined from the attenuation of the electron beam after passing the specimen according to Beer's law Burge and Silvester, 1959;Halloran et al, 1978;Linders et al, 1982Linders et al, , 1984Marton and Schiff, 1941;Poszgai and Barna, 1983;S i k h , 1983;Wall, 1979;Bahr, 1962, 1965). However, in conventional electron microscopy and also in STEM the unscattered electrons that have not interacted with the specimen and consequently do not contribute to the information concerning the mass thickness are superimposed on the brightfield signal.…”
Section: Mass Determination In Freeze-dried Cryosectwnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to the effect of extraneous X-rays on the background intensity measurements as discussed above. Linders et al (1982Linders et al ( ,1984 have compared X-ray microanalysis and measurements of the electron beam current after attenuation by the specimen for mass determination and found higher accuracy in the electron beam current measurements.…”
Section: Mass Determination In Freeze-dried Cryosectwnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative X-ray microanalysis in an electron probe instrument CTEM, STEM, or SEMI requires that either the beam current be measured accurately or that it be kept constant accurately (Linders et al, 1984). For Morgan and Davies (1982) it was necessary to know the beam current in order to ascertain that the electron dose was sufficiently low not to cause loss of elements such as S, C1, K, Na, and P by volatilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%