2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Photodetachment Cross-Section Measurements for Hydrocarbon Chain Anions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no experimental data on the REA process for carbon chain molecules, using a similar theoretical approach, we determine in this study cross sections for the inverse process to REA, namely photodetachment (PD), and compare with available data from recent photodetachment experiments [19,20]. This allows us to verify the validity of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is no experimental data on the REA process for carbon chain molecules, using a similar theoretical approach, we determine in this study cross sections for the inverse process to REA, namely photodetachment (PD), and compare with available data from recent photodetachment experiments [19,20]. This allows us to verify the validity of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…(9) and compares them with the available experimental data, which were estimated in Ref. [20] to have about 25 % of uncertainty. The agreement is very good for C 2 H − , especially for experimental data points near the photodetachment threshold.…”
Section: Comparison With the Results Of Photodetachment Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 (top right panel). The main source of polyynes at these radii is from photodetachment of their respective anions (as studied in the laboratory by Best et al 2011),…”
Section: Impact Of Anions On the Cse Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original measurements, calculations and estimates are taken from the following sources: Adams & Smith (1977), Adams et al (1980), Adams et al (1984), Adusei & Fontijn (1994), Allen & Robinson (1977), Andreazza et al (1995), Andreazza & Singh (1997), Anicich et al (2003b), Anicich et al (2003a), Anicich et al (1977), Anicich et al (1984), Anicich et al (1990), Anicich (1993), Barckholtz et al (2001), Barlow (1984), Barlow & Dunn (1987), Baulch (2005), Baulch et al (1992), Berteloite et al (2010), Berteloite et al (2010), Best et al (2011, Black (1975), Blake et al (1986), Bocherel et al (1996), Bohme et al (1982), Brown & Bolina (2007). Bruhns et al (2010), Brunetti & Liuti (1975) Harada & Herbst (2008), Harrison et al (1986), Hasegawa & Herbst (1993), Hawley et al (1990), Hemsworth et al (1974), Herbst (1983), Herbst et al (1984), Herbst & Leung (1986), Herbst et al (1989a), Herbst & Leung (1989), Herbst et al (1989b), Herbst et al (1989c), Herbst & ...…”
Section: Appendix A: Rate12 Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%