2005
DOI: 10.5303/jkas.2005.38.2.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ABSOLUTE PARAMETERS AND MASS-RADIUS-LUMINOSITY RELATIONS FOR THE SUB-TYPES OF W UMα BINARIES

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this we had to make a suitable mass-luminosity calibration for these kinds of stars. In this study we have used the mass-luminosity and mass-radius relations for both W and A subtypes of the W UMaYtype binaries given by Awadalla & Hanna (2005). The radii derived for these systems according to these relations are listed in Table 5.…”
Section: W Umaytype Spectroscopic Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this we had to make a suitable mass-luminosity calibration for these kinds of stars. In this study we have used the mass-luminosity and mass-radius relations for both W and A subtypes of the W UMaYtype binaries given by Awadalla & Hanna (2005). The radii derived for these systems according to these relations are listed in Table 5.…”
Section: W Umaytype Spectroscopic Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 that the radius of the primary component approaches to the value for zero age main sequence (ZAMS) stars, i.e. basically a ZAMS star (Awadalla and Hanna, 2005;Liu and Yang, 2000b). Fig.…”
Section: Light Curve Modeling and Photometric Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First quantitative observations were made by Tsessevich (1954) who reported a period of 1.159 days. The later studies of FO Hya indicate a slightly asymmetric light curve having strong curvature in both maxima and minima of unequal depths (Binnendijk, 1960;Kopal, 1978;Candy and Candy, 1997), which was explained by the presence of spot on a star of the binary system. Candy and Candy (1997) have suggested that the slight and irregular variation in the orbital period of FO Hya is presumably caused by mass transfer between the components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, when the more massive star obscures the less massive one at the primary eclipse, it is called W-subtype (Binnendijk 1970(Binnendijk , 1977. At present, there are two conflicting arguments that W-subtypes evolve into A-subtypes (Flannery 1976;Lucy 1976;Wilson 1978;Mochnacki 1981;Hilditch 1989;Awadalla & Hanna 2005;Eker et al 2006;Gazeas & Niarchos 2006) and that there is no evolutionary link between them (Maceroni & Van't Veer 1996;Yildiz & Doğan 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%