2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0909-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute myocardial blood flow vs relative myocardial perfusion: Which one is better?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute MBF quantification has proven its utility in clinical routine; however, the latter requires an arterial input function 35 that can be derived from the PET image by placing a VOI in the left ventricular cavity. 36 While image-derived input functions are routinely obtained in clinical PET-MPI, this approach is hampered in mice due to the relatively small left ventricular dimensions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute MBF quantification has proven its utility in clinical routine; however, the latter requires an arterial input function 35 that can be derived from the PET image by placing a VOI in the left ventricular cavity. 36 While image-derived input functions are routinely obtained in clinical PET-MPI, this approach is hampered in mice due to the relatively small left ventricular dimensions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute MBF quantification has proven its utility in clinical routine, however, the latter requires an arterial input function [33] that can be derived from the PET image by placing a VOI in the left ventricular cavity [34]. While image-derived input functions are routinely obtained in clinical PET-MPI, this approach is hampered in mice due to the relatively small left ventricular dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%