1966
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.21.2638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Measurement of X-Ray Scattering Factors of Copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between the first powder measurement performed by Batterman, Chipman & DeMarco (1961) and our recent ?-ray results is surprisingly good for small values of sin 0/2, although the quoted experimental error in the powder data is rather large. On the contrary, the later powder measurements performed by Hosoya & Yamagishi (1966) and by Temkin, Henrich & Raccah (1972) clearly disagree with our ?-ray data. It is also very interesting to note that for small values of sin 0/2 the ?-ray results are in very good agreement with early measurements performed by Jennings, Chipman & DeMarco (1964) on perfect Cu crystals.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier X-ray Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The agreement between the first powder measurement performed by Batterman, Chipman & DeMarco (1961) and our recent ?-ray results is surprisingly good for small values of sin 0/2, although the quoted experimental error in the powder data is rather large. On the contrary, the later powder measurements performed by Hosoya & Yamagishi (1966) and by Temkin, Henrich & Raccah (1972) clearly disagree with our ?-ray data. It is also very interesting to note that for small values of sin 0/2 the ?-ray results are in very good agreement with early measurements performed by Jennings, Chipman & DeMarco (1964) on perfect Cu crystals.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier X-ray Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Temperature factors did not alter excessively between the various anisotropic refinements, but the mean value of u =0.0064(2) A z is appreciably smaller than values obtained from X and y-ray measurements (Battermann, Chipman & DeMarco, 1961;Jennings, Chipman & DeMarco, 1964;Hosoya & Yamagishi, 1966;Temkin, Henrich & Raccah, 1972;Freund, 1973Freund, , 1975aSchneider, 1976), where the mean value is 0.0072(3) •z. This clearly indicates the need for corrections for thermal diffuse scattering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The (222) and (333), as well as the (220) atomic scattering factors are, however, considered to be reliable within the limits determined by the uncertainties in the correction for the thermal motion of the atoms. In Table 1 our results are summarized and compared with the results of earlier work by Batterman, Chipman & DeMarco (1961), Jennings, Chipman & DeMarco (1964, Hosoya & Yamagishi (1966), Tempkin, Henrich & Raccah (1972), and Freund (1973.…”
Section: =23°0 Au~mentioning
confidence: 96%