2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Lymphocyte Count Nadir During Chemoradiation as a Prognostic Indicator of Esophageal Cancer Survival Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, most dosimetry parameters are significantly associated with DALC from RT, suggesting that radiation damage to the immune system is not limited to blood and lymphatic organs. This finding is consistent with previous studies showing significance in tumor stage, 11 lung volume, 17 gross tumor volume or planning target volume, 12 , 15 , 17 , 20 , 24 radiation dose, 22 radiation fractions, 22 definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), 10 , 13 , 15 radiation type (proton beam therapy, intensity modulated RT, or stereotactic body RT), 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 32 , 33 MBD, 10 , 11 and concurrent chemotherapy. 13 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, most dosimetry parameters are significantly associated with DALC from RT, suggesting that radiation damage to the immune system is not limited to blood and lymphatic organs. This finding is consistent with previous studies showing significance in tumor stage, 11 lung volume, 17 gross tumor volume or planning target volume, 12 , 15 , 17 , 20 , 24 radiation dose, 22 radiation fractions, 22 definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), 10 , 13 , 15 radiation type (proton beam therapy, intensity modulated RT, or stereotactic body RT), 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 32 , 33 MBD, 10 , 11 and concurrent chemotherapy. 13 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although the optimal cutoff for defining lymphopenia is unknown, the majority of studies use a cutoff of 0.5 × 10 9 /L based on CTCAE, 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 15 , 18 , 22 , 25 , 42 , 43 , 44 whereas some studies use 0.2 × 10 9 /L. 7 , 10 , 13 , 16 , 39 Besides empirically referred cutoff from CTCAE, statistical methods such as ROC curves are also reported to define suitable thresholds. 8 , 45 In the present study, we used a cutoff of 0.5 × 10 9 /L and found that only MBD and ITDV were correlated with severe lymphopenia ( P = .001 and P = .014, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although lower lymphocyte count predicts worse survival outcomes in other solid tumors, there have been contradicting reports in the literature for esophageal cancer. One study 2 in the United States showed that in patients with stage I to III esophageal cancer (85% adenocarcinoma), the lymphopenia group (defined as lymphocyte <0.5 × 10 9 /L) had a higher risk of death (HR for death, 1.6; P = .027) compared with the nonlymphopenia group. This is supported by another study 23 comparing proton beam therapy with IMRT in 448 patients with stage I-IVA esophageal cancer, which showed improved survival with higher lymphocyte count (HR for survival, 1.551; P = .01 per 1 unit of lymphocyte).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because lymphocytes play a major role in exerting antitumor immunity, many clinical studies have demonstrated a correlation between absolute lymphocyte counts and survival. 2 , 3 , 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%