Absolute isotope abundances of tin

Devillers, C.; Lecomte, T.; Hagemann, Robert

doi:10.1016/0020-7381(83)80010-2

Cited by 31 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Sn concentration in the standard solution was fixed at 60 ppb, and Sb was mixed to be 30 ppb for the external standardization. Previous studies did not report a unique denominator of Sn isotope ratios Jeffery, 1965, 1967;Devillers et al, 1983; Rosman et al, 1984;Rosman and McNaughton, 1987;Loss et al, 1990;McNaughton and Loss, 1990;McNaughton and Rosman, 1991;Lee and Halliday, 1995;Gale, 1997;Clayton et al, 2002;Moynier et al, 2009;Osawa et al, 2009;Haustein et al, 2010;Nickel et al, 2011). Fig.…”

Section: Long-term Reproducibility Of Srm 3161a Analysis By Mc-icp-msmentioning

confidence: 88%

Tin isotope analysis of cassiterites from Southeastern and Eastern Asia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Long-term Reproducibility Of Srm 3161a Analysis By Mc-icp-msmentioning

confidence: 88%

Tin isotope analysis of cassiterites from Southeastern and Eastern Asia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In 1969, CAWIA [4] assigned an uncertainty U[A r (Ru)] of 0.03 to that value of A r (Ru), which was based on the abundance measurements by Friedman and Irsa [378], Baldock [379], and White et al [127], and not on the chemical determination by Gleu and Rehm [380] in view of the large uncertainties in the chemical determination. The best measurements of the isotopic composition, on which the above representative isotopic composition is based, corresponds to the work by Devillers et al [381], yielding A r (Ru) = 101.068 (13) calculated with the atomic mass data by Wapstra and Bos [49]. The use in 1961 of earlier atomic mass data [23] does not significantly affect the magnitude of the ear- lier A r (Ru) determinations.…”

Section: Tc Technetiummentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Feitknecht et al [382] found no significant differences between three meteoritic and one terrestrial sample. Devillers et al [381] found no significant differences between a meteoritic sample, two samples of well-defined geographic origin, and a commercial sample. In view of the excellent agreement between all the data, CAWIA [11] The name derives from the Greek rhodon for rose because of the "rose color of dilute solutions of its salts".…”

Section: Tc Technetiummentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Devillers et al [154] identified interferences at 114 Sn and 115 Sn, which were subsequently quantified by Rosman et al [155] and corrected, leading to the isotope abundances provided in this review. Further very high-precision measurements of refined samples of Sn and cassiterites by Rosman and McNaughton [399,400] have shown that natural isotope fractionation, if it exists, is extremely small.…”

Section: Sn Tin (Stannum)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report)

Laeter¹,

Böhlke²,

Bièvre³

et al. 2003

Pure and Applied Chemistry

915

554

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgmentAbstract: A consistent set of internationally accepted atomic weights has long been an essential aim of the scientific community because of the relevance of these values to science and technology, as well as to trade and commerce subject to ethical, legal, and international standards. The standard atomic weights of the elements are regularly evaluated, recommended, and published in updated tables by the Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances (CAWIA) of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). These values are invariably associated with carefully evaluated uncertainties. Atomic weights were originally determined by mass ratio measurements coupled with an understanding of chemical stoichiometry, but are now based almost exclusively on knowledge of the isotopic composition (derived from isotope-abundance ratio measurements) and the atomic masses of the isotopes of the elements. Atomic weights and atomic masses are now scaled to a numerical value of exactly 12 for the mass of the carbon isotope of mass number 12. Technological advances in mass spectrometry and nuclear-reaction energies have enabled atomic masses to be determined with a relative uncertainty of better than 1 × 10 -7 . Isotope abundances for an increasing number of elements can be measured to better than 1 × 10 -3 . The excellent precision of such measurements led to the discovery that many elements, in different specimens, display significant variations in their isotope-abundance ratios, caused by a variety of natural and industrial physicochemical processes. While such variations increasingly place a constraint on the uncertainties with which some standard atomic weights can be stated, they provide numerous opportunities for investigating a range of important phenomena in physical, chemical, cosmological, biological, and industrial processes. This review reflects the current and increasing interest of science in the measured differences between source-specific and even sample-specific atomic weights. These relative comparisons can often be made with a smaller uncertainty than is achieved in the best calibrated "absolute" (= SI-traceable) atomic-weight determinations. Accurate determinations of the atomic weights of certain elements also influence the values of fundamental constants such as the Avogadro, Faraday, and universal gas constants. This review is in two parts: the first summarizes the development of the science of atomic-weight determinations during the 20 th century; the second summarizes the changes and variations that have been recognized in the values and uncertainties of atomic weights, on an element-by-element basis, in the latter part of the 20 th century.J. R. de LAETER et al.

show abstract

“…The new value of Sn/"'Sn was 5.5% lower than that of Devillers, Lecomte, and Hagemann (84), while the value of Sn/12"Sn was 1.1% higher than the previously accepted value. The new values for the abundances of the isotopes of tin lend support to the contention that the p process does not make a significant contribution to "'Sn, a result which favors the photodisintegration model of p-process nucleosynthesis (82).…”

Section: Isotope Ms In Cosmic Abunmncementioning

confidence: 43%

Role of isotope mass spectrometry in cosmic abundance studies

Laeter

1994

Mass Spectrometry Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Absolute isotope abundances of tin

Cited by 31 publications

References 16 publications

Tin isotope analysis of cassiterites from Southeastern and Eastern Asia

Tin isotope analysis of cassiterites from Southeastern and Eastern Asia

Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report)

Role of isotope mass spectrometry in cosmic abundance studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About