Absolute Intensities in CO2: 3ν3 near 1.4 μm

12C16O2 line intensity FTS measurements with 1% assumed accuracy in the 1.5–1.6μm spectral range

“…when one anomalous line in [4] is removed. The agreement with the results of Johns et al [8] for the hot band is excellent on the average. Together with the global approach of Table 5, a line by line comparison with the calculated data provided by the above cited databases [1,14] are also given on Fig.…”

“…(4) was squared. |R 0 | 2 , A, and B are therefore directly comparable to those of Johns et al [8] who used the same expansion. when one anomalous line in [4] is removed.…”

“…4 which shows a smoothed variation versus J. This effect does not occur when the same line by line comparison, not shown here, is done with the results of [4,8]. The good agreement with [4,8] is also illustrated on Table 4 (note the disagreement on the sign with [5] for the B coefficient).…”

“…Therefore, values obtained for |R 0 | 2 , A, and B, are directly comparable with those of other authors [4,5]. However, to compare with Johns et al [8] who adjusted the hot band with the term between parenthesis squared, a second fit was performed with the same expression as in [8].…”

“…The HITRAN database [1] contains intensities from a DND global calculation [7] performed in 1992. Later on, line intensities were measured by Johns et al [8].…”