“…At the end, we obtained a final absolute calibration of our measured line positions using methane standards because the 2←0 HCl line centers were estimated to be less accurate [14]. For this, we considered two methane studies: (1) the positions of only two lines, R0 and Q1, by Ishibashi et al [41] who used the saturated absorption spectroscopy technique and, (2) the line positions of a much larger dataset by Zolot et al [42] who used comb-tooth resolved dual comb spectroscopy to obtain 1153 positions (and intensities) between 5870 and 6130 cm −1 ; of these, 46 lines had reported accuracies close to 0.2 MHz. Using the two methane transitions [41] changed the absolute calibration of our HCl-calibrated line centers by −0.00043 cm −1 , producing an overall multiplicative factor of 0.999999928(0.000000001).…”