2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute earthquake locations using 3-D versus 1-D velocity models below a local seismic network: example from the Pyrenees

Abstract: S U M M A R YLocal seismic networks are usually designed so that earthquakes are located inside them (primary azimuthal gap <<180• ) and close to the seismic stations (0-100 km). With these local or near-regional networks (0• -5 • ), many seismological observatories still routinely locate earthquakes using 1-D velocity models. Moving towards 3-D location algorithms requires robust 3-D velocity models. This work takes advantage of seismic monitoring spanning more than 30 yr in the Pyrenean region. We investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we implement a new correction to account for the sphericity of the Earth which, if ignored, can yield traveltime errors of up to 1–2 s for raypaths exceeding 500 km. We chose the “sphere‐in‐a‐box” approach from Theunissen et al (). This approach calculates hypocenters and raypaths in a Cartesian coordinate system where the topography, station locations, and initial hypocenters are converted from latitude, longitude, and depth to the local left‐handed Cartesian coordinates x (azimuth 60°), y (azimuth 330°), and z (down) (Theunissen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we implement a new correction to account for the sphericity of the Earth which, if ignored, can yield traveltime errors of up to 1–2 s for raypaths exceeding 500 km. We chose the “sphere‐in‐a‐box” approach from Theunissen et al (). This approach calculates hypocenters and raypaths in a Cartesian coordinate system where the topography, station locations, and initial hypocenters are converted from latitude, longitude, and depth to the local left‐handed Cartesian coordinates x (azimuth 60°), y (azimuth 330°), and z (down) (Theunissen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the “sphere‐in‐a‐box” approach from Theunissen et al (). This approach calculates hypocenters and raypaths in a Cartesian coordinate system where the topography, station locations, and initial hypocenters are converted from latitude, longitude, and depth to the local left‐handed Cartesian coordinates x (azimuth 60°), y (azimuth 330°), and z (down) (Theunissen et al, ). This way, we can represent the subduction zone and related seismicity in their true geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a 3-D velocity model that accommodates an in-situ status should be adopted. Many researchers have applied a high-resolution 3-D velocity model for earthquake locations [6], [17], [18] and microseismic event locations of reservoirs [19], [20], petroleum exploration [21] and rock slopes [22]. These results have demonstrated the 3-D model's advantages over a simple 1-D velocity model.…”
Section: A the Velocity Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, despite these difficulties, the systematic confrontation of the event depths with local networks optimally distributed above the seismicity (e.g. Perrot et al, 2005;Cushing et al, 2008;Got et al, 2011;Theunissen et al, 2018) suggests that the first order variations of the hypocentral depths of earthquakes at the scale of the territory appear to be interpretable. Fig.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%