1993
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute concentrations of metabolites in the adult human brain in vivo: quantification of localized proton MR spectra.

Abstract: In vivo concentrations of cerebral metabolites were obtained by means of 52 single-voxel, localized proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic examinations of different regions of the brain performed in 26 healthy adults aged 21-32 years. The study was performed at 2.0 T with use of a circularly polarized head coil to ensure homogeneous radio-frequency excitation and signal reception. Proton MR spectra were obtained in the stimulated-echo acquisition mode under fully relaxed conditions (repetition time > or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

73
357
7
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(442 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
73
357
7
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, glucose is detectable in the CSF at over three times its concentration in GM or WM 28, 29, 30. This is also the case for lactate, which is detectable in CSF but negligible in normal brain tissue 26.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, glucose is detectable in the CSF at over three times its concentration in GM or WM 28, 29, 30. This is also the case for lactate, which is detectable in CSF but negligible in normal brain tissue 26.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The absolute in vivo brain metabolite concentrations are the subject of an ongoing debate in the literature, a result of different levels reported by different groups (17). These variations are attributed, in the order they are encountered, to: 1) hardware (coils, field strength, and RF electronics); 2) localization techniques used (single voxel vs. 2D or 3D multivoxel acquisition methods); 3) reconstruction strategies and their approach to baseline irregularities, peak area estimation, voxel "bleed," and partial volumes; and 4) quantification methods, internal vs. external standards, and correction for B 0 , B 1 , T 1, T 2 , TE, TR, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations are attributed, in the order they are encountered, to: 1) hardware (coils, field strength, and RF electronics); 2) localization techniques used (single voxel vs. 2D or 3D multivoxel acquisition methods); 3) reconstruction strategies and their approach to baseline irregularities, peak area estimation, voxel "bleed," and partial volumes; and 4) quantification methods, internal vs. external standards, and correction for B 0 , B 1 , T 1, T 2 , TE, TR, etc. (17). To circumvent controversy, we assessed reproducibility rather than absolute levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No T 2 correction was performed, because acetate spectra were acquired with TE ϭ 30 ms, that is much shorter than acetate T 2 relaxation time (ա 400 ms). For each spectrum a correction was performed for different coil loading between the in vivo and the phantom measurements (10,11).…”
Section: Quantitative 1 H-mrsmentioning
confidence: 99%