1994
DOI: 10.2307/3440797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absenteeism, Efficiency Wages and Shirking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
131
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 See for example Barmby et al (1994) who indicate that the effect of absence behavior on the probability of being fired may act as a worker discipline device. (1)), then the effect of the firing rate on the probability of reporting a moderate accident is not significantly different from zero.…”
Section: Does Reporting An Accident Increase the Subsequent Firing Rate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17 See for example Barmby et al (1994) who indicate that the effect of absence behavior on the probability of being fired may act as a worker discipline device. (1)), then the effect of the firing rate on the probability of reporting a moderate accident is not significantly different from zero.…”
Section: Does Reporting An Accident Increase the Subsequent Firing Rate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 For instance, in the EU-15 in 2004 there were around 4 million occupational accidents leading to more than 3 days' absence from work, which is equivalent to an accident rate of 3.2%. The total number of accidents, including those which did not involve absence from work amounted to 6.4 million, equivalent to an accident rate of 5.3%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We extend and build upon a mix of standard work-leisure models to theoretically study the absence behavior of workers (Brown 1994;Barmby et al 1994;Brown and Sessions 1996;Gilleskie 1998).…”
Section: Identifying Contagious Presenteeism and Negative Externalitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although related and sometimes combined in laws, sick pay schemes differ crucially from maternity 1 Other papers in the literature on sickness absence looked at and decomposed general determinants (Barmby et al 1994;Markussen et al 2011), investigated the impact of probation periods (Riphahn 2004;Ichino and Riphahn 2005), culture (Ichino and Maggi 2000), gender (Ichino and Moretti 2009;Gilleskie 2010), income taxes (Dale-Olsen 2013), and unemployment (Askildsen et al 2005;Nordberg and Røed 2009;Pichler 2015). There is also research on the impact of sickness on earnings (Sandy and Elliott 2005;Markussen 2012). leave schemes (Gruber 1994;Ruhm 1998;Waldfogel 1998;Rossin-Slater et al 2013;Lalive et al 2014;Carneiro et al 2015;Thomas 2015) due to the negative externalities induced by contagious presenteeism in combination with information asymmetries between employers and employees about the type and extent of the employee's disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%