Absent Presence: Auchinleck and Kyng Alisaunder

Bridges, Venetia

doi:10.1017/9781782046165.008

Cited by 32 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12 For commented editions of the relevant texts by Mannyng and Rolle, see Wogan-Browne et al (1999). 13 Among other recent publications attending to the Auchinleck Manuscript and multilingualism, see Bridges (2016), Butler (2016), andLibbon (2016). 14 Work on the language of individual Auchinleck texts has gradually undone the early argument according to which the manuscript's contents were not only inscribed at a London location, but also composed there for inclusion in the book (see e.g.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

French lexis in the Auchinleck Manuscript: A digital-philological approach

Critten

Gay-Crosier

Picca

2021

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Auchinleck Manuscript was produced in the 1330s in London and is best known to scholars of Middle English literature on account of the romances that it transmits. Several of these texts treat the establishment and defense of England and it has been argued that their interest in English history is matched by the language in which almost all of the manuscript’s texts are written: English. This article reconsiders the Englishness of the Auchinleck Manuscript via a quantitative analysis of its lexis. We show that a comparatively large proportion of the Auchinleck lexicon has connections to French and that, of these words with French connections, many do not appear to have been much used in English writing before the 1300s. Our statistics are derived via program scripts that match Auchinleck lexicon items to headword entries in the Middle English Dictionary and collect data pertaining to word etymology and earliest dates of citation from those entries. Where previous studies have emphasized the porous boundaries between English and French in 14th-century English contexts, we posit that some poets might aim to make creative capital out of the deliberate juxtaposition of the languages. The argument is supported by a series of visualizations; interactive versions of these visualizations and the data on which they are based are archived at our project website (https://solliryc.github.io/AuchinleckDataViz/).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%