2006
DOI: 10.1080/02786820600784315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of14C in PM2.5 Emissions from Gasohol Combustion in Small Engines

Abstract: PM2.5 combustion emissions from small engines (string trimmer and chainsaw) using gasoline containing biogenic ethanol were collected and analyzed for their 14 C content. The sampling methodology was designed to minimize potential bias from organic artifact effects. The 14 C in the PM2.5 emissions was found to be drastically smaller (approximately a factor of 40) than the 14 C amounts measured in the fuels. This suggests that the current method of using 14 C measurements on ambient aerosol to estimate the cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The likely explanation for this occurrence is that biodiesel vapor escaped from the biodiesel fuel sump (located about 20 feet from the dilution tunnel) and was drawn into the system along with the dilution air. Such vapor likely absorbed to the quartz filters via the gas-phase adsorption artifact and could explain why the backup filters are so high in C 14 Whatever the cause of this discrepancy, when the data are corrected for a vapor adsorption artifact (using equation 1 and shown on the left hand side of Table 3) the calculation of pMC becomes approximately 2% for the B0 tests, as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The likely explanation for this occurrence is that biodiesel vapor escaped from the biodiesel fuel sump (located about 20 feet from the dilution tunnel) and was drawn into the system along with the dilution air. Such vapor likely absorbed to the quartz filters via the gas-phase adsorption artifact and could explain why the backup filters are so high in C 14 Whatever the cause of this discrepancy, when the data are corrected for a vapor adsorption artifact (using equation 1 and shown on the left hand side of Table 3) the calculation of pMC becomes approximately 2% for the B0 tests, as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These carbon atoms combine with oxygen to form CO 2 . Since the half-life of 14 C is about 5730 years, fossil fuels, which are typically over a million years old, are almost completely devoid of 14 Lewis et al 2006). While this technique is not capable of defining all anthropogenic sources (i.e., wood smoke for residential heating contains modern carbon), it is useful for defining the contribution from mobile-sources (i.e., cars, trucks, small-engines) to ambient PM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the ROB, GRI, and PYE parameterizations are used for all P-S/IVOCs regardless of their source, and the amount of SOA from HOA (or CIOA) associated P-S/IVOCs can be calculated as simply the product of the total SI-SOA and the ratio HOA / POA (or CIOA / POA), where the hourly HOA, CIOA, and SI-SOA concentrations are used. It should also be noted that in Los Angeles gasoline contains nearly 10 % ethanol made from corn and thus modern carbon (de Gouw et al, 2012), but it is thought that ethanol and its combustion products are not incorporated into aerosols (Lewis et al, 2006). It should be noted that the fossil-modern split from the box model that is described above depends on the initial P-S/IVOCs concentrations and volatility distribution assumed in the model.…”
Section: Total Soa Concentration: Fossil Vs Contemporary Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%