1991
DOI: 10.3109/15368379109031406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of Non-Thermal Microwave Effects on the Function of Giant Nerve Fibers

Abstract: Functioning of the giant axon of the isolated earthworm ventral nerve cord was examined during exposure to 6.45 GHz microwaves. We used continuous wave and pulsed irradiation, either synchronized with stimuli or asynchronous, lasting for 10-50 min at specific absorption rate from 30 to 230 W/kg. Action potential (AP) conduction velocity and the capability of nerve fiber to answer long-lasting high-frequency stimulation served as indices of microwave effect. Under some experimental conditions the nerve appeared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To add more complications, some speci®c effects required a precise combination of different exposure parameters, e.g., the carrier frequency and pulse repetition rate [Gapeev et al, 1994;Semin et al, 1995b] or the modulation frequency and the radiation intensity [Blackman et al, 1980;Adey, 1988;Dutta et al, 1989;Schwartz et al, 1990]. Since the windows often are very narrow, the experimental search for unique combinations of different exposure parameters among the innumerable possibilities is problematic, and it is no wonder that many attempts to reveal the effectiveness windows by probing various combinations of exposure parameters resulted in negative ®ndings [Chou and Guy, 1978;Bush et al, 1981;Liu et al, 1982;Pakhomov et al, 1992Pakhomov et al, , 1995. More information and discussion of window phenomena can be found in specialized reviews on pulsed microwave bioeffects [Blackwell and Saunders, 1986;Postow and Swicord, 1986;Pakhomov and Murphy, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To add more complications, some speci®c effects required a precise combination of different exposure parameters, e.g., the carrier frequency and pulse repetition rate [Gapeev et al, 1994;Semin et al, 1995b] or the modulation frequency and the radiation intensity [Blackman et al, 1980;Adey, 1988;Dutta et al, 1989;Schwartz et al, 1990]. Since the windows often are very narrow, the experimental search for unique combinations of different exposure parameters among the innumerable possibilities is problematic, and it is no wonder that many attempts to reveal the effectiveness windows by probing various combinations of exposure parameters resulted in negative ®ndings [Chou and Guy, 1978;Bush et al, 1981;Liu et al, 1982;Pakhomov et al, 1992Pakhomov et al, , 1995. More information and discussion of window phenomena can be found in specialized reviews on pulsed microwave bioeffects [Blackwell and Saunders, 1986;Postow and Swicord, 1986;Pakhomov and Murphy, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the nerve vitality effect is associated with the failure to maintain ionic gradients by active transport. Pakhomov et al [1991] used CW and PW 6.45 GHz MW, synchronized with stimuli or asynchronous and lasting for 10-50 min at SAR 30-230 W/kg, on the giant axon of the isolated earthworm ventral nerve cord. They found only a thermal effect.…”
Section: Peripheral Nervous System and Isolated Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%