2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00302-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of gaze direction effects on EEG measures of sensorimotor function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that there was a small remaining asymmetry in posture, since participants had to look left or right from the midline. Hence, gaze direction effects on motor cortical activity (Baker et al 1999) cannot be ruled out entirely, although we have previously not been able to detect such effects in movement-related electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (Hesse et al 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It should be noted that there was a small remaining asymmetry in posture, since participants had to look left or right from the midline. Hence, gaze direction effects on motor cortical activity (Baker et al 1999) cannot be ruled out entirely, although we have previously not been able to detect such effects in movement-related electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (Hesse et al 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous works have investigated different options in the attempt to find a neutral reference location. Several referencing schemes have been suggested like the vertex (Lehmann et al, 1998; Hesse et al, 2004), unimastoid (Başar et al, 1998; Thatcher et al, 2001), linked mastoids (Gevins and Smith, 2000; Croft et al, 2002), or nose (Andrew and Pfurtscheller, 1996; Essl and Rappelsberger, 1998), but no true neutral location has been found (Nunez and Srinivasan, 2006). Moreover, the average reference (Offner, 1950; Nunez et al, 2001) and the Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) (Yao, 2001) have been shown to be valid solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the reference site should be an electrically neutral location, where there are no potential changes; however, there are no truly neutral locations in the human body. In order to reduce the influence of the reference electrode, a number of different reference schemes have been proposed, such as the Cz (Lehmann et al, 1998 ; Hesse et al, 2004 ), nose (Andrew and Pfurtscheller, 1996 ; Essl and Rappelsberger, 1998 ), linked mastoids or ears (Gevins and Smith, 2000 ; Croft et al, 2002 ; Jin et al, 2015 ), and CAR (Offner, 1950 ; Nunez et al, 2001 ). Related studies have indicated that the CAR reference has obtained a large consensus because it is least biased (Srinivasan et al, 1998 ; Ferree, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%