Plant Structural Biology: Hormonal Regulations 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91352-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abscisic Acid Signaling and Biosynthesis: Protein Structures and Molecular Probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 151 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PYR1 belongs to subfamily III, whose receptors possess, in general, lower ABA binding affinity than subfamily I and II receptors . Two of the hypersensitive residues defined by our screen (I110 and A160) differ in sequence between receptor subtypes (Figure S3), and prior work has demonstrated that sequence differences at these sites contribute to differences in both ABA sensitivity and agonist selectivity between receptor subtypes. The other two hypersensitivity sites that we defined (V81 and E141) are invariant across receptor subtypes (Figure S3) and would not be predicted to alter sensitivity based on evolutionary considerations alone. Saturation mutagenesis can therefore be useful for defining hotspot residues that do not naturally contribute to differences in agonist sensitivity between receptor subtypes and/or that are highly conserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…PYR1 belongs to subfamily III, whose receptors possess, in general, lower ABA binding affinity than subfamily I and II receptors . Two of the hypersensitive residues defined by our screen (I110 and A160) differ in sequence between receptor subtypes (Figure S3), and prior work has demonstrated that sequence differences at these sites contribute to differences in both ABA sensitivity and agonist selectivity between receptor subtypes. The other two hypersensitivity sites that we defined (V81 and E141) are invariant across receptor subtypes (Figure S3) and would not be predicted to alter sensitivity based on evolutionary considerations alone. Saturation mutagenesis can therefore be useful for defining hotspot residues that do not naturally contribute to differences in agonist sensitivity between receptor subtypes and/or that are highly conserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%