Abrupt disintegration of highly porous particles in early stage dissolution

Karampalis, Dimitris; Li, Yongliang; Caragay, Joel; Alexiadis, Alessio; Zhang, Zhibing; Fryer, P.J.; Bakalis, Serafim

doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.04.037

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dissolution should not break aggregates for the dissolution kinetics remains controlled by diffusion in the quiescent liquid inside aggregates during the whole dissolution process. Fragmentation/peptization occurring at the end of dissolution does accelerate kinetics in many instances[44,45,46], which does not look being the present case.…”

mentioning

confidence: 61%

Dissolution kinetics of zinc oxide and its relationship with physicochemical characteristics

Cardoso

Narcy

Durosoy³

et al. 2021

Powder Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 61%

Dissolution kinetics of zinc oxide and its relationship with physicochemical characteristics

Cardoso

Narcy

Durosoy³

et al. 2021

Powder Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the reaction rate increases with the decrease in particle size. (We do not consider here the possibility of particle breakup, which can occur in several application [42]. )…”

Section: Effect Of Particle Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Solid–Fluid Reaction Models—A Literature Review

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive review is carried out on the models and correlations for solid/fluid reactions that result from a complex multi-scale physicochemical process. A simulation of this process with CFD requires various complicated submodels and significant computational time, which often makes it undesirable and impractical in many industrial activities requiring a quick solution within a limited time frame, such as new product/process design, feasibility studies, and the evaluation or optimization of the existing processes, etc. In these circumstances, the existing models and correlations developed in the last few decades are of significant relevance and become a useful simulation tool. However, despite the increasing research interests in this area in the last thirty years, there is no comprehensive review available. This paper is thus motivated to review the models developed so far, as well as provide the selection guidance for model and correlations for the specific application to help engineers and researchers choose the most appropriate model for feasible solutions. Therefore, this review is also of practical relevance to professionals who need to perform engineering design or simulation work. The areas needing further development in solid–fluid reaction modelling are also identified and discussed.

show abstract