2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abrupt changes in the patterns and complexity of anterior cingulate cortex activity when food is introduced into an environment

Abstract: Foraging typically involves two distinct phases, an exploration phase where an organism explores its local environment in search of needed resources and an exploitation phase where a discovered resource is consumed. The behavior and cognitive requirements of exploration and exploitation are quite different and yet organisms can quickly and efficiently switch between them many times during a foraging bout. The present study investigated neural activity state dynamics in the anterior cingulate sub-region of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the assays in which we did not observe an effect are relatively non-demanding, and do not require a significant degree of learning or goal/value updating. Thus, increasing PN activation in the medial prefrontal cortex through DREADD signaling, above the level that might be observed during behavioral engagement in less cognitively demanding tasks such as food consumption (Caracheo et al, 2013 ), does not produce any change in behavioral output. However, during tasks requiring higher cognitive demand (Caracheo et al, 2013 ), increasing the gain of select PN within the frontal cortex has distinct behavioral consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, the assays in which we did not observe an effect are relatively non-demanding, and do not require a significant degree of learning or goal/value updating. Thus, increasing PN activation in the medial prefrontal cortex through DREADD signaling, above the level that might be observed during behavioral engagement in less cognitively demanding tasks such as food consumption (Caracheo et al, 2013 ), does not produce any change in behavioral output. However, during tasks requiring higher cognitive demand (Caracheo et al, 2013 ), increasing the gain of select PN within the frontal cortex has distinct behavioral consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although a handful of computational models have simulated ACC function previously (e.g., Alexander & Brown, 2011;Botvinick et al, 2001;Brown & Braver, 2005;Holroyd & Coles, 2002, 2008Holroyd & McClure, 2015;Holroyd, Yeung, Coles, & Cohen, 2005;Khamassi, et al, 2011;Silvetti et al, 2011;Verguts, 2017;Verguts et al, 2015;Yeung et al, 2004), to our knowledge none of these models have examined the essential role of ACC in encoding task execution as distributed representations that evolve dynamically with time (Balaguer-Ballester et al, 2011;Caracheo et al, 2013;Durstewitz et al, 2010;Lapish et al, 2008). Our simulations are thus the first to provide a formal account of this crucial aspect of ACC function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, Jeremy Seamans and colleagues have systematically investigated the activity of ACC neurons during the execution of task sequences (Balaguer-Ballester, Lapish, Seamans, & Durstewitz, 2011;Caracheo, Emberly, Hadizadeh, Hyman, & Seamans, 2013;Durstewitz, Vittoz, Floresco, & Seamans, 2010;Hyman, Ma, Balaguer-Ballester, Durstewitz, & Seamans, 2012;Hyman, Whitman, Emberly, Woodward, & Seamans, 2013;Lapish, Durstewitz, Chandler, & Seamans, 2008;Ma, Hyman, Lindsay, Phillips, & Seamans, 2014;. Their work focuses on distributed patterns of activity that characterize entire ensembles of neurons, rather than on the responses of the individual neurons that comprise the ensembles.…”
Section: Acc and Action Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this effect was so consistent and powerful that we were able to decode an animal’s environmental context based solely on mPFC ensemble states [19]. If we expand our concept of a context to one that does not necessarily need to be only spatial, we see that, in fact, similar results, i.e., large changes in mPFC ensemble states, have also been found with changes in behavioral sequence [42,44], task phase [45], rules [46], or reward location [47]. All of these differences can be viewed as changes of a larger context representation; in many cases, the context may be cognitively-based, or, in the absence of a clear task, it may be spatially-based.…”
Section: Processing and Encoding Information About Space And Contextmentioning
confidence: 94%