Abstract:Fungi play a key role in soil-plant interactions, nutrient cycling and carbon flow and are essential for the functioning of arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Some studies have shown that the composition of fungal communities is highly sensitive to variations in environmental conditions, but little is known about how the conditions control the role of fungal communities (i.e., their ecosystem function). We used DNA metabarcoding to compare taxonomic and functional composition of fungal communities along a gradient… Show more
“…4a). Saprophytic microbes have a wide range of functional abilities, and most soils contain most functional guilds of saprophytes (H€ attenschwiler et al 2005, Grau et al 2017, Semchenko et al 2018). The positive relationship, thus, supports the idea of a functional relationship between plants and microbes at the global scale Jackson 2006, Chen et al 2019).…”
Citation: Liu, L., K. Zhu, N. Wurzburger, and J. Zhang. 2020. Relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity vary across taxonomic groups and spatial scales. Ecosphere 11(1):Abstract. Plant diversity has long been assumed to predict soil microbial diversity. However, contradictory results have been found when examining their relationships, particularly at broad spatial scales. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the patterns in the correlation between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity and the underlying factors driving the relationship. We collected correlation data from 84 studies covering more than 3900 natural terrestrial samples globally. Using the hierarchical mixed-effects model, we investigated factors including targeted taxonomic group, microbial examination method, sampling extent, biome type, soil type, and environmental factors to assess the patterns of the plant-microbial correlation and the determinants of their variations. We found that microbial richness displayed a modest but positive correlation with plant diversity (r = 0.333, CI = 0.220-0.437). In spite of variability among taxonomic groups and their relationship with plant diversity, positive correlations were more pronounced in the intermediate sampling extent of latitude and elevation coverage, and tropical forests. Among examined environmental factors, soil pH was negatively associated with the plant and soil microbial relationships at large spatial scales. The plant-microbial correlation appears more sensitive to edaphic factor variation in the poor nutrients and soil less compact systems. Collectively, our results point to key differences across taxonomic groups, spatial scales and biomes, and the modulating effects of climate and soil. The findings shed light on our deep understanding in plant-microbial diversity relationships at broad spatial scales and ecosystem sensitivity to biodiversity loss and environmental change.
“…4a). Saprophytic microbes have a wide range of functional abilities, and most soils contain most functional guilds of saprophytes (H€ attenschwiler et al 2005, Grau et al 2017, Semchenko et al 2018). The positive relationship, thus, supports the idea of a functional relationship between plants and microbes at the global scale Jackson 2006, Chen et al 2019).…”
Citation: Liu, L., K. Zhu, N. Wurzburger, and J. Zhang. 2020. Relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity vary across taxonomic groups and spatial scales. Ecosphere 11(1):Abstract. Plant diversity has long been assumed to predict soil microbial diversity. However, contradictory results have been found when examining their relationships, particularly at broad spatial scales. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the patterns in the correlation between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity and the underlying factors driving the relationship. We collected correlation data from 84 studies covering more than 3900 natural terrestrial samples globally. Using the hierarchical mixed-effects model, we investigated factors including targeted taxonomic group, microbial examination method, sampling extent, biome type, soil type, and environmental factors to assess the patterns of the plant-microbial correlation and the determinants of their variations. We found that microbial richness displayed a modest but positive correlation with plant diversity (r = 0.333, CI = 0.220-0.437). In spite of variability among taxonomic groups and their relationship with plant diversity, positive correlations were more pronounced in the intermediate sampling extent of latitude and elevation coverage, and tropical forests. Among examined environmental factors, soil pH was negatively associated with the plant and soil microbial relationships at large spatial scales. The plant-microbial correlation appears more sensitive to edaphic factor variation in the poor nutrients and soil less compact systems. Collectively, our results point to key differences across taxonomic groups, spatial scales and biomes, and the modulating effects of climate and soil. The findings shed light on our deep understanding in plant-microbial diversity relationships at broad spatial scales and ecosystem sensitivity to biodiversity loss and environmental change.
“…Fungal communities are well known to differ among habitats and to be patchily distributed (e.g. Grau et al ., ; Maghnia et al ., ; Chaudhary et al ., ), but OMFs have received little attention. Bunch et al .…”
Section: Orchid Mycorrhizal Fungus Identity and Orchid Distribution Amentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fungal communities are well known to differ among habitats and to be patchily distributed (e.g. Grau et al, 2017;Maghnia et al, 2017;Chaudhary et al, 2018), but OMFs have received little attention. Bunch et al (2013) found that Cypripedium acaule associated with different OMFs in locations with different soil chemistry.…”
Symbioses are ubiquitous in nature and influence individual plants and populations. Orchids have life history stages that depend fully or partially on fungi for carbon and other essential resources. As a result, orchid populations depend on the distribution of orchid mycorrhizal fungi (OMFs). We focused on evidence that local-scale distribution and population dynamics of orchids can be limited by the patchy distribution and abundance of OMFs, after an update of an earlier review confirmed that orchids are rarely limited by OMF distribution at geographic scales. Recent evidence points to a relationship between OMF abundance and orchid density and dormancy, which results in apparent density differences. Orchids were more abundant, less likely to enter dormancy, and more likely to re-emerge when OMF were abundant. We highlight the need for additional studies on OMF quantity, more emphasis on tropical species, and development and application of next-generation sequencing techniques to quantify OMF abundance in substrates and determine their function in association with orchids. Research is also needed to distinguish between OMFs and endophytic fungi and to determine the function of nonmycorrhizal endophytes in orchid roots. These studies will be especially important if we are to link orchids and OMFs in efforts to inform conservation.
“…The earlier-mentioned global prevalence of spatial heterogeneity in soil microbial communities has potential implications for the interactions, survival, and evolution of virtually all terrestrial organisms. Both symbiotic mutualists and pathogens, two functional groups that have the most direct effects on plant and animal survival and reproduction, generally show strong compositional differences among habitats at a landscape scale (Geml et al, 2016;Grau et al, 2017). Because many of these exhibit substantial differences in interacting with various plants and animals, these soil microbes can enable the co-existence of closely related species, either by niche divergence, as shown in Osborne et al, or by density-dependent interactions.…”
Section: The Importance Of Preserving Habitat Diversity For the Consementioning
Pulse‐type perturbation through excreta by animals creates a mosaic of short‐term high nutrient‐load patches in the soil. How this affects microbial community composition and how long these impacts last are important for microbial community dynamics and nutrient cycling.
Our study focused on the short‐term responses to N by bacterial communities and ‘functional groups’ associated with the N cycle in a lowland evergreen tropical rainforest. We applied a single urea pulse, equivalent to urine‐N deposition by medium‐sized mammals to simulate N enrichment and changes in soil N availability, and analysed soil bacterial communities using molecular methods, before and after urea application.
Urea addition increased mineral N availability and changed bacterial community composition, from phylum to operational taxonomic unit levels, however, taxon richness and diversity were unaffected. Taxa involved in the physiologically “narrow” processes of nitrification (e.g. Nitrosospira) and denitrification (e.g. Phyllobacteriaceae, Xanthomonadaceae and Comamonadaceae) increased their relative abundance, while N2‐fixers (e.g. Rhodospirillales, and Rhizobiales) decreased after treatment. While a temporal legacy on both community composition and functional group profile was observable 58 and 159 days after treatment, at the latter date bacterial communities were already tending towards pre‐treatment composition.
We suggest that pulse‐type perturbation by mammal urine that occurs on a daily basis has strong short‐term effects on patch dynamics of soil microbiota and N availability. Such a spatio‐temporally dynamic soil environment enhances overall microbial richness and diversity, and contributes to the apparent temporal resilience of community composition.
A http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12998/suppinfo is available for this article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.