2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abrasive wear resistance of WC-based composites, produced with Co or Ni-rich binders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agglomerates of particles are then observed, reflecting a poor distribution of the binder around the WC particles. Incorporation of nickel was reported as a beneficial element that increases the wettability with the carbide particles [16]. The coating 4 (Figure 3d) sample was obtained using a lower flux of powder than that measured for all coatings.…”
Section: Surface Morphology Of the Wc Composite Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Agglomerates of particles are then observed, reflecting a poor distribution of the binder around the WC particles. Incorporation of nickel was reported as a beneficial element that increases the wettability with the carbide particles [16]. The coating 4 (Figure 3d) sample was obtained using a lower flux of powder than that measured for all coatings.…”
Section: Surface Morphology Of the Wc Composite Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The decrease in the powder feed rate allows a better distribution of the liquid binder around the tungsten carbide particles, thus limiting the phenomenon of surface oxidation. On the other hand, the decrease in particle velocity and temperature led to an increase in the content of W 2 C in the deposit, indicating significant decarburization related to these changes in deposition parameters [16].…”
Section: Microstructure Of the Wc Composite Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the reasons highlighted, it is necessary to find new solutions that allow the replacement of the cobalt binder by a more economical alternative, less toxic and with equal or superior properties. The alternative with the greatest potential is the total or partial replacement of cobalt by other transition metals such as Fe, Cr and Ni [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. The traditional WC-Co has also some limitations with respect to corrosion resistance and in that sense the use of Fe and Ni based binders has been the target of research to improve this property in carbides [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%