2019
DOI: 10.1353/jqr.2019.0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abraham S. Yahuda (1877–1951) and the Politics of Modern Jewish Scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing awareness of nineteenth-century intellectuals, especially amateurs like Moritz Heidenheim (Franz-Klauser 2006), philologists such as Wilhelm Gesenius (Tal 2013), manuscript purchasers like the Qaraite writer and traveller Abraham Firkovich (Akhiezer 2018; Harviainen and Shehadeh 1994, 2003), and Jewish intellectuals such as Abraham Shalom Yahuda (Gonzalez 2019; Schorch 2019b), helps us grasp how far the disciplinary form of the study of the Bible depends on whose stories it has excluded. That goes for both the orientalist discourses of the past and the thin reclamatory discourses of the present, given the tendency of the latter to fight on the ground established by the scholarly genealogy they criticize more often than to look beyond it.…”
Section: Scholarly Moves In the Study Of The Samaritans Since 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing awareness of nineteenth-century intellectuals, especially amateurs like Moritz Heidenheim (Franz-Klauser 2006), philologists such as Wilhelm Gesenius (Tal 2013), manuscript purchasers like the Qaraite writer and traveller Abraham Firkovich (Akhiezer 2018; Harviainen and Shehadeh 1994, 2003), and Jewish intellectuals such as Abraham Shalom Yahuda (Gonzalez 2019; Schorch 2019b), helps us grasp how far the disciplinary form of the study of the Bible depends on whose stories it has excluded. That goes for both the orientalist discourses of the past and the thin reclamatory discourses of the present, given the tendency of the latter to fight on the ground established by the scholarly genealogy they criticize more often than to look beyond it.…”
Section: Scholarly Moves In the Study Of The Samaritans Since 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%