2016
DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2016.1165355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground carbon storage in a freshwater swamp forest ecosystem in the Niger Delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since dynamics in land use change easily impacts ecosystem services over short time scales (Li et al, 2013) and can directly lead to overall changes at regional scale (Vidal-Legaz et al, 2013) for ecosystem services such as carbon storage, guided use of ecosystems to prevent intense impacts are advocated. Carbon storage is indeed an ecosystem service that ecosystem degradation-through forest loss, disturbance and modification affects greatly (Igu and Marchant, 2016); however, such impacts have direct effects on the above ground carbon (AGC) (through biomass removal or reduction) than the soil carbon store (in comparison with the AGC) that are not easily discernible. Variations in decomposition rate of the litter (depending on land use and ecosystem) can equally contribute to the time lag involved in soil carbon store changes even when ecosystems become modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since dynamics in land use change easily impacts ecosystem services over short time scales (Li et al, 2013) and can directly lead to overall changes at regional scale (Vidal-Legaz et al, 2013) for ecosystem services such as carbon storage, guided use of ecosystems to prevent intense impacts are advocated. Carbon storage is indeed an ecosystem service that ecosystem degradation-through forest loss, disturbance and modification affects greatly (Igu and Marchant, 2016); however, such impacts have direct effects on the above ground carbon (AGC) (through biomass removal or reduction) than the soil carbon store (in comparison with the AGC) that are not easily discernible. Variations in decomposition rate of the litter (depending on land use and ecosystem) can equally contribute to the time lag involved in soil carbon store changes even when ecosystems become modified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest had representative tree stands for each of the structural intervals or categories and a healthy juvenile/middle class tree population size (Figure 3), which is suitable for good recruitment and replacement for the mature and emergent populations. Such mature forests' with large trees are veritable assets in carbon sequestration for the region (Igu & Marchant, 2016) and useful in providing necessary ecosystem services that support the livelihood of its owners. Tree stems which ranged from 128 -409 stems per hectare (with a mean of 255) across the forest plots were within the range of 245 -467 stems per hectare, as reported for other tropical forests (Campbell et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FSF is part of the tropical rain forest and has an important contribution as climate change modulators. As a carbon storage zone, the FSF in the Niger Delta, for example, is capable of storing carbon on average 228.28 ton/hectare, a large storage capacity (Igu & Marchant, 2016). The ability to store carbon by the FSF depends on: 1) the ability of flora to absorb carbon from the atmosphere; 2) the material cycle flowing from living biota to dead biota; 3) subsequent deposition and storage processes in the earth (Harrison, 2013).…”
Section: Threat To Freshwater Swamp Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%