2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground carbon and nutrient distributions are hardly associated with canopy position for trees in temperate forests on poor and acidified sandy soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the reductions presented in this study across nutrients were in line with the literature, except for the 50% higher K throughfall and 50% lower Mg throughfall underneath, respectively, Scots pine and Douglas fir compared to similar stands in 1990 (Van Ek and Draaijers, 1994). These differences might be related to the canopy uptake of Mg in Scots pine (Table 3.1, Table S3.3-S3.4) and the low K content in needles of Douglas fir (Vos et al, 2023b), reducing canopy leaching due to lower soil fertility (Nordén, 1991).…”
Section: Harvest Intensity Effects Differs Between Nutrientssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, the reductions presented in this study across nutrients were in line with the literature, except for the 50% higher K throughfall and 50% lower Mg throughfall underneath, respectively, Scots pine and Douglas fir compared to similar stands in 1990 (Van Ek and Draaijers, 1994). These differences might be related to the canopy uptake of Mg in Scots pine (Table 3.1, Table S3.3-S3.4) and the low K content in needles of Douglas fir (Vos et al, 2023b), reducing canopy leaching due to lower soil fertility (Nordén, 1991).…”
Section: Harvest Intensity Effects Differs Between Nutrientssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This elevated P deposition in the growing season contradicts expectations, as P is usually actively taken up by the canopy in oligotrophic ecosystems (Helmisaari and Mälkönen, 1989;Gordon et al, 2000;Houcai et al, 2021). Canopy leaching of P, a potential contributor to up to 67% of the total P deposition estimate (Duchesne et al, 2001;Talkner et al, 2010;Sohrt et al, 2019), is unlikely due to its peak in the autumn (Sohrt et al, 2019) and its correlation with foliar P content (Zhang et al, 2022), which exhibited signs of deficiency in the studied stands (Vos et al, 2023b). We, therefore, argue that the elevated P deposition during the growing season is more likely attributed to a notable contribution from sources such as pollen or local polluters, such as agricultural sources (Van Ek and Draaijers, 1994;Allen et al, 2010;Kopáček et al, 2011;Tipping et al, 2014).…”
Section: Seasonal Variations In Total Depositionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the accuracy of the IER-method to quantify bulk deposition and throughfall, a field study was caried out in the Netherlands (GPS 52.015745, 5.759924) in which we collected paired observations of bulk deposition and throughfall using water samples (referred to as the water-method) and the IER-method. The chosen field site consisted of a mature stand of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) which has been harvested at different intensities in February 2019, which resulted in four ¼-ha plots within the same stand: an unharvested control (~0% canopy openness), a high-thinning (~25% canopy openness), a shelterwood (~75% canopy openness) and a clearcut (100% canopy openness) (Vos et al, 2023a;Vos et al, 2023b). The different harvest intensities allow to test the method for quantifying bulk deposition and throughfall including the effect of organic substances on the performance of the IER-method.…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%