2016
DOI: 10.3390/f7040079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground Biomass and Carbon in a South African Mistbelt Forest and the Relationships with Tree Species Diversity and Forest Structures

Abstract: Biomass and carbon stocks are key information criteria to understand the role of forests in regulating global climate. However, for a bio-rich continent like Africa, ground-based measurements for accurate estimation of carbon are scarce, and the variables affecting the forest carbon are not well understood. Here, we present the first biomass study conducted in South Africa Mistbelt forests. Using data from a non-destructive sampling of 59 trees of four species, we (1) evaluated the accuracy of multispecies abo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
35
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(109 reference statements)
9
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In tropical natural forests, where several species cohabit and fulfill the major ecosystem functions, it is common to observe the abundance and dominance of highly productive tree species, thus increasing the chances that diversity–carbon relationships are mediated by selection effects. This was partly confirmed by our previous observations in South African mistbelt forests, especially the greater influence of the most dominant species on biomass stocks (Mensah, Veldtman, du Toit, Glèlè Kakaï, & Seifert, ). More and more, research tends to show how functional diversity and/or functional dominance play a major role in ecosystem functioning (Baraloto et al., ; Clark, Flynn, Butterfield, & Reich, ; Ruiz‐Jaen & Potvin, ; Song et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In tropical natural forests, where several species cohabit and fulfill the major ecosystem functions, it is common to observe the abundance and dominance of highly productive tree species, thus increasing the chances that diversity–carbon relationships are mediated by selection effects. This was partly confirmed by our previous observations in South African mistbelt forests, especially the greater influence of the most dominant species on biomass stocks (Mensah, Veldtman, du Toit, Glèlè Kakaï, & Seifert, ). More and more, research tends to show how functional diversity and/or functional dominance play a major role in ecosystem functioning (Baraloto et al., ; Clark, Flynn, Butterfield, & Reich, ; Ruiz‐Jaen & Potvin, ; Song et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This fact is even often used to support the reason why mixed species communities of plantations are far more productive than monospecific stands. But it might also be well possible that increasing species richness increases the chances of inclusion of highly productive and naturally favored dominant species (Ruiz‐Benito et al., ), as shown by our previous results on the influence of most dominant species on carbon stocks in mistbelt forests (Mensah, Veldtman, du Toit, Glèlè Kakaï, & Seifert, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AGB (Mg ha −1 ) was further upscaled to the study site level (10,000 ha) by applying the surface expansion factor (100). For carbon stock determination, the AGB (Mg ha− 1 ) was converted by applying a carbon conversion factor of 0.5 [43-44].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forest inventories in general, DBH and height (H) are measured and registered in the field in order to predict the AGB using allometric models. AGB is then converted to carbon density for each field-reference tree (Chave et al 2014, Mensah et al 2016, Zhang et al 2016, Peng et al 2017. With ALS, it became possible to measure the heights of trees in large forests in a short time, which makes it more practical compared to filed-measured methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%