2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.87.023417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Above-threshold ionization with highly charged ions in superstrong laser fields. I. Coulomb-corrected strong-field approximation

Abstract: Aiming at the investigation of above-threshold ionization in superstrong laser fields with highly charged ions, we develop a Coulomb-corrected strong-field approximation (SFA). The influence of the Coulomb potential of the atomic core on the ionized electron dynamics in the continuum is taken into account via the eikonal approximation, treating the Coulomb potential perturbatively in the phase of the quasiclassical wave function of the continuum electron. In this paper the formalism of the Coulomb-corrected SF… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time variable is changed to the phase variable η in Eq. (2) and the η-integral is calculated with the saddle point method; η s is the saddle point value for the phase η [44]. There exists no asymmetry between the ionization probabilities from the spin up and down states 2s + (m j = 1/2) and 2s − (m j = −1/2), i.e., the ionization probabilities are equal.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Ionization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time variable is changed to the phase variable η in Eq. (2) and the η-integral is calculated with the saddle point method; η s is the saddle point value for the phase η [44]. There exists no asymmetry between the ionization probabilities from the spin up and down states 2s + (m j = 1/2) and 2s − (m j = −1/2), i.e., the ionization probabilities are equal.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Ionization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix element M in the Coulomb corrected SFA reads [44]: where the final state ψ V C is the Eikonal-Coulomb-Volkov-state [44], i.e., the wave function in the eikonal approximation for the electron in continuum under the action of the laser and Coulomb field of the atomic core; E(η) = E 0 cos(ωη) is the laser field with the phase η = t − z/c, c is the speed of light, andψ i is the dressed initial bound state which is the solution of the following Schrödinger equation [44] i∂ tψi = H Bψi ,…”
Section: Calculation Of the Ionization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forseeing the subsequent calculation we can insert the typical value for the coordinate x ∼ √ κ/E s and time t ∼ κ/E s into the perturbation of the original differential equation: V ∼ Z/x ∼ Z √ E s /κ and ∂ xx S ∼ Vt/x 2 ∼ Z √ E s /κ and see that the quantum term is of the same order as the potential one and the simultaneous perturbative treatment of both of terms is justified when E 0 E a , see equation (22) in [31]. In the usual eikonal approximation, in particular in [14,17], the last quantum term ∂ xx S is neglected and the atomic potential is treated perturbatively in the eikonal equation (10).…”
Section: High-order Coulomb Corrected Strong-field Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p(η) = p+A(η)+T(η, p), q(η) = q+A(η)+T(η, q) are the relativistic kinetic momentum after the recollision and during excursion, respectively, the drift momentum T(η, p) =ẑ[p · A(η) + A 2 (η)/2]/c, and V (r) is the Coulomb-potential of the atomic core [58]. The findings presented here are not changed for CTMC calculations with more accurate potentials using numerical Dirac−Fock electron densities [59].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flux is calculated via RCCSFA based on the Dirac equation [47][48][49]. The wave function of the electron ionized from a hydrogen-like atomic bound state |φ 0 (η) in a strong laser field E(η) = −A (η), with the vector-potential A(η) = (E 0 /ω) sin(η)x, and the laser phase η = ω(t − z/c), is given by [49]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%