2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Above and belowground phenology of four Mediterranean sub-shrubs. Preliminary results on root–shoot competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf shedding occurred in latespring and early-summer, in relation with increasing temperature, radiation and drought, which is in agreement with leaf water potential decrease reported for Cistus species during summer (Correia et al, 1987;Harley et al, 1987). The asynchrony in vegetative growth observed between the two study years agrees with the relationship between the seasonal growth rhythm and rainfall distribution pattern reported by Gill and Mahall (1986), Kyparissis et al (1997) and Palacio and Montserrat-Martı´(2007) for droughtdeciduous Mediterranean plants. In fact, both species exhibited a fast response to rainfall that occurred during May 1994 (114 mm), extending the period of intensive growth until June, while in 1995 rainfall during the same period was only 15 mm and the growth flush ended by April.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Leaf shedding occurred in latespring and early-summer, in relation with increasing temperature, radiation and drought, which is in agreement with leaf water potential decrease reported for Cistus species during summer (Correia et al, 1987;Harley et al, 1987). The asynchrony in vegetative growth observed between the two study years agrees with the relationship between the seasonal growth rhythm and rainfall distribution pattern reported by Gill and Mahall (1986), Kyparissis et al (1997) and Palacio and Montserrat-Martı´(2007) for droughtdeciduous Mediterranean plants. In fact, both species exhibited a fast response to rainfall that occurred during May 1994 (114 mm), extending the period of intensive growth until June, while in 1995 rainfall during the same period was only 15 mm and the growth flush ended by April.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…If root growth peaks early in the growing season, aboveground and belowground phenologies can be synchronous (Scagel et al 2007, Medvigy et al 2009). However, because root and shoot phenologies are commonly asynchronous (Lahti et al 2005, Willaume and Pages 2006, Palacio and Montserrat-Marti 2007, Steinaker and Wilson 2008, Abramoff and Finzi 2015, shoot phenology may not always be a reliable predictor of plant response to climate change. Root phenology varies by species and among ecosystems because it is driven by complex interactions between abiotic factors such as temperature and moisture as well as stored plant carbon and nutrients (Abramoff and Finzi 2015).…”
Section: Climate Change Alters Plant and Microbial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the endogenous cues, exogenous factors are important for controlling the fine root dynamics and the effects of exogenous factors on fine root dynamics have been received increasingly attention because of the expected climate changes (Kitajima et al 2010). Previous studies have correlated fine root production with water regimes in water-limited shrublands (Peek et al 2005;Palacio and Montserrat-Martí 2007;Padilla et al 2015), and the effects of the soil moisture on the fine root dynamics have been reported to be species specific (Wilcox et al 2004). Shading is another exogenous factor regulating fine root dynamics because root growth and turnover are correlated with photosynthetically active radiation (Fitter et al 1998;Fitter et al 1999;Volder et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%