2009
DOI: 10.1615/tsagiscij.v40.i5.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About the Secondary Separation at Supersonic Flow Over a Compression Ramp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
29
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is only in recent years that existence of secondary vortices in large separated regions induced at a compression corner have been discussed by Neiland et al. (2008) and Shvedchenko (2009), Egorov et al. (2011).…”
Section: The Compression Corner Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is only in recent years that existence of secondary vortices in large separated regions induced at a compression corner have been discussed by Neiland et al. (2008) and Shvedchenko (2009), Egorov et al. (2011).…”
Section: The Compression Corner Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, in several investigations of supersonic and hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interactions (SBLI) involving large separated regions, numerical studies have shown multiple vortex structures/eddies embedded in the main separation bubble (Smith & Khorrami 1991; Korolev, Gajjar & Ruban 2002; Neiland, Sokolov & Shvedchenko 2008; Shvedchenko 2009). The critical parameter governing the origin and existence of these eddies seems to be the geometric angle , which represents the strength of perturbation to the boundary layer such as a shock wave inducing separation at a compression corner or a shock wave from a wedge incident on a boundary layer growing over a surface such as a flat plate beneath the wedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first, near the wall, is a rotational viscous subsonic region which is most sensitive to disturbances, the second is a main inviscid rotational region and the third is an inviscid irrotational outer region, which is most resistive to disturbances. Interaction between these decks (Stewartson 1974) has been shown to be dependent on wall temperature by a number of authors such as Brown, Cheng & Lee (1990), Seddougui, Bowles & Smith (1991), Kerimbekov, Ruban & Walker (1994), Cassel, Ruban & Walker (1995), Cassel, Ruban & Walker (1996), Neiland, Sokolov & Shvedchenko (2009) and Shvedchenko (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%