The methodology of changing ring flexibility to detect the
π-conjugative stabilization of bridgehead
carbocations has been applied to eight 2-oxo (X = O) bridgehead
carbocations. On the basis of the
solvolytic behavior observed in kinetics and product analyses, the
eight 2-oxo bridgehead substrates
were classified into three categories: three substrates solvolyzing
without ion-pair return that leads
to primary isomers (class A), three substrates that form primary
isomers by ion-pair return during
solvolysis (class B), and two substrates that undergo solvent addition
to the carbonyl group to form
hemiacetals during solvolysis (class C). It was concluded that the
substrates of class C could not
be used for the present purpose. Essentially constant ethanolysis
rate ratios, k(X = O)/k(X =
H2),
of 10-8.2−10-8.7 at 25 °C were obtained
between four 2-oxo substrates in classes A and B and the
corresponding parent unsubstituted ones. The result was
interpreted to suggest that the
π-conjugative stabilization of tertiary α-carbonyl carbocations is
negligibly small, if present. Slightly
more negative k(X = O)/k(X = H2)
values of 10-9.7 and 10-9.2 for highly
flexible bicyclo[4.2.2]dec-1-yl and bicyclo[4.3.1]dec-1-yl systems, respectively, were attributed
to complex conformations in
the ground and incipient carbocations. PM3 calculations on some
2-methylene and 2-oxo bridgehead
carbocations supported the experimental results. Comparison of the
solvolysis rates of 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-2-oxobutyl mesylate with those of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl
mesylate estimated from
the rates of the corresponding chloride also failed to support the
π-conjugative stabilization of
α-carbonyl carbocations.