2016
DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-4181-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About the effects of polarising optics on lidar signals and the Δ90 calibration

Abstract: Abstract. This paper provides a model for assessing the effects of polarising optics on the signals of typical lidar systems, which is based on the description of the individual optical elements of the lidar and of the state of polarisation of the light by means of the Müller–Stokes formalism. General analytical equations are derived for the dependence of the lidar signals on polarisation parameters, for the linear depolarisation ratio, and for the signals of different polarisation calibration setups. The equa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
244
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(79 reference statements)
6
244
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uncertainties in the basic lidar-derived optical properties and the POLIPHON retrieval products are extensively analyzed and discussed by Freudenthaler et al (2009, , Mamouri and Ansmann (2014, 2016), and Bravo-Aranda et al (2016 and will not be discussed here. Typical uncertainties in the basic particle optical properties are given in Table 4 for 532 nm.…”
Section: Retrieval Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties in the basic lidar-derived optical properties and the POLIPHON retrieval products are extensively analyzed and discussed by Freudenthaler et al (2009, , Mamouri and Ansmann (2014, 2016), and Bravo-Aranda et al (2016 and will not be discussed here. Typical uncertainties in the basic particle optical properties are given in Table 4 for 532 nm.…”
Section: Retrieval Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper calibration of particle depolarisation measurements requires accurate measurements of the cross-polarised and co-polarised components of the particle backscattering coefficient. However, accurate measurements of these quantities may be difficult to obtain, often as a result of the depolarising properties of different optical devices included in the receiver (Freudenthaler, 2016). This translates into a non-negligible uncertainty affecting particle depolarisation measurements, which includes both a systematic component (bias) and a random component (statistical error).…”
Section: Basil and The Hope Field Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BASIL performs high-resolution and accurate measurements of the vertical profiles of atmospheric temperature and water vapour, both in the daytime and at nighttime, exploiting both the rotational and vibrational Raman lidar techniques in the UV (Di Girolamo et al, 2004, 2009a, 2016Bhawar et al, 2011). Aside from temperature and water vapour, BASIL also measures the vertical profiles of particle backscatter at 354.7, 532 and 1064 nm, as well as particle extinction and depolarisation at 354.7 and 532 nm (Griaznov et al, 2007;Di Girolamo et al, 2009b, 2012a.…”
Section: Basil and The Hope Field Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• with respect to both polarization analyzers (Spinhirne et al, 1982;McGill et al, 2002;Alvarez et al, 2006;David et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2009;Freudenthaler et al, 2009;Neely III et al, 2013;Bravo-Aranda et al, 2013;Freudenthaler, 2016). This type of calibration is not sensitive to polarization effects in the transmitter optics or to any optics upstream of the halfwaveplate.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Depolarization Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an alternate version of the half-waveplate calibration, this waveplate may be placed in the transmitter to control the orientation of the plane of polarization of the laser light transmitted to the sky (Liu and Wang, 2013;Neely III et al, 2013;Freudenthaler, 2016;Bu et al, 2017). Eloranta and Piironen (1994) use a Pockels cell in their laser to the same effect.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Depolarization Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%