2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9765-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion for fetal defects: two current arguments

Abstract: A common utilitarian argument in favor of abortion for fetal defects rests on some controversial assumptions about what counts as a life worth living. Yet critics of abortion for fetal defects are also in need of an argument free from controversial assumptions about the future child's quality of life. Christopher Kaczor (in: Kaczor (ed), The ethics of abortion: women's rights, human life, and the question of justice, Routledge, New York, 2011) has devised an analogy that apparently satisfies this condition. On… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having found that certain groups of sociodemographic characteristics supported induced abortions following the detection of fetal anomalies, we argue that it is extremely important to first inform professionals concerning this very delicate issue, so that they know the various sociodemographic groups, and how each group copes with the issue [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having found that certain groups of sociodemographic characteristics supported induced abortions following the detection of fetal anomalies, we argue that it is extremely important to first inform professionals concerning this very delicate issue, so that they know the various sociodemographic groups, and how each group copes with the issue [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical and value aspects are assessed when discussing abortion due to fetal defects. (Nuccetelli, 2017). Kaczor (2015) gives good arguments to show that individual personal life begins at conception.…”
Section: Termination Of Pregnancy Due To Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a well-argued piece on the moral and ethical reasons for justifying abortion (17), Nuccetelli contends that we cannot use justifications of quality of life with Down syndrome, or for that matter any congenital anomaly, as it can always vary and statistics cannot replace individual outcomes. The only factor that can be considered is that of procreative freedom, which in this case, is the right of the parents (who are in agreement with each other), as it receives moral weight in any ethical argument (17).…”
Section: Abortion and Down Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a well-argued piece on the moral and ethical reasons for justifying abortion (17), Nuccetelli contends that we cannot use justifications of quality of life with Down syndrome, or for that matter any congenital anomaly, as it can always vary and statistics cannot replace individual outcomes. The only factor that can be considered is that of procreative freedom, which in this case, is the right of the parents (who are in agreement with each other), as it receives moral weight in any ethical argument (17). However, another way of interpreting abortion in case of Down syndrome would be that of stretching the timeline to after birth with the same set of conditions and thus arguing against abortion: If we are willing to allow abortion on the grounds of a Down syndrome diagnosis, would it not be equivalent to allowing infanticide on those very same grounds?…”
Section: Abortion and Down Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%