“…This line of thinking also suggests that the word ‘tourism’ erases the emotional and embodied nature of abortion travel with its connotations of pleasure and adventure‐seeking; as Freeman explains, abortion tourism is a problematic term that ‘erases the struggle, pain, shame and fear that travelling for abortions entails for many women’ (2017, p. 854). In lieu of describing abortion travel as tourism, scholars have proposed a number of alternative terms, just as in reproductive mobilities: exile (Kasstan & Crook, 2018; Singer, 2020), banishment (Kelly & Tuszynski, 2016), ‘sometimes‐migrating’ (Murray & Khan, 2020), enforced migration (Mecinska et al., 2020), and those travelling as ‘abortion refugees’ (Chambers et al., 2019). While these terms serve to challenge the notion that abortion travel could accurately be described as ‘tourism’, other geographers have found tourism to be a useful lens for examining abortion travel and mobilities.…”