2019
DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1631963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion exile: navigating Mexico’s fractured abortion landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These scholars critique the language of medical tourism , which suggests a leisurely vacation and feelings of agency and choice. Some who seek treatment abroad experience feelings of betrayal by their home health system and such severe constraints on their treatment options that they are forced to seek care elsewhere, facing risk and hardship in the process (Gilmartin and White 2011; Inhorn and Patrizio 2009; Ona Singer 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These scholars critique the language of medical tourism , which suggests a leisurely vacation and feelings of agency and choice. Some who seek treatment abroad experience feelings of betrayal by their home health system and such severe constraints on their treatment options that they are forced to seek care elsewhere, facing risk and hardship in the process (Gilmartin and White 2011; Inhorn and Patrizio 2009; Ona Singer 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, travel features prominently in patients’ accounts of care seeking (White et al 2016). Those seeking abortion may share with other medical travelers the experience of going long distances for care to unfamiliar locations and from providers and facilities they do not know (Gilmartin and White 2011; Ona Singer 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of thinking also suggests that the word ‘tourism’ erases the emotional and embodied nature of abortion travel with its connotations of pleasure and adventure‐seeking; as Freeman explains, abortion tourism is a problematic term that ‘erases the struggle, pain, shame and fear that travelling for abortions entails for many women’ (2017, p. 854). In lieu of describing abortion travel as tourism, scholars have proposed a number of alternative terms, just as in reproductive mobilities: exile (Kasstan & Crook, 2018; Singer, 2020), banishment (Kelly & Tuszynski, 2016), ‘sometimes‐migrating’ (Murray & Khan, 2020), enforced migration (Mecinska et al., 2020), and those travelling as ‘abortion refugees’ (Chambers et al., 2019). While these terms serve to challenge the notion that abortion travel could accurately be described as ‘tourism’, other geographers have found tourism to be a useful lens for examining abortion travel and mobilities.…”
Section: Abortion Mobilities: a Working Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative experiences of abortion journeys are emotional as well as embodied and fear is another common narrative. While the overwhelming majority of women do not regret their abortion ( Rocca et al 2015 ), the experience of having to travel can make women feel ‘banished’ ( Kelly and Tuszynski 2016 ), in ‘reproductive exile’ ( Inhorn and Patrizio 2009 ) or in ‘abortion exile’ ( Singer 2019a ). For Kelly and Tuszynski (2016, 26) , women ‘ … are reminded at each step of their journey that they are undeserving of medical care at home’.…”
Section: The Abortion Journeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are also often negotiating patriarchal control from their partner or family with the fear of being caught. Similarly, Singer’s (2019a) work on women who travel from other states to Mexico City for a legal abortion highlights the multiple obstacles they face. Practicalities around travel time, available transport, and childcare affected how travel is experienced, if they were able to travel at all.…”
Section: The Abortion Journeymentioning
confidence: 99%