2020
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2008006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion during the Covid-19 Pandemic — Ensuring Access to an Essential Health Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
93
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to end a pregnancy could be due to the perception of risk posed by COVID-19, reduced access to pre-natal care, and limited social support during lockdowns. 23 Additionally, decision-making could be influenced by the economic downturn COVID-19 has precipitated, with many people facing unemployment or financial losses. 24 It has also been suggested that social distancing policies may increase rates of unintended pregnancy due to increased time spent at home with a partner or reduced access to contraception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to end a pregnancy could be due to the perception of risk posed by COVID-19, reduced access to pre-natal care, and limited social support during lockdowns. 23 Additionally, decision-making could be influenced by the economic downturn COVID-19 has precipitated, with many people facing unemployment or financial losses. 24 It has also been suggested that social distancing policies may increase rates of unintended pregnancy due to increased time spent at home with a partner or reduced access to contraception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in access to these essential services due to safety concerns about exposure to the coronavirus and travel restrictions poses short‐ and long‐term risks to women and girls, while also increasing the burden of care on health workers now and in the future 13 . Some restrictions on service provision of healthcare services for women, for example, access to family planning and abortion care in some states in the United States, have been put in place despite opposition from health workers and medical associations 14 . The Guttmacher Institute, a US‐based think tank focusing on sexual and reproductive health and rights, estimates that a 10% decline in the use of reversible contraception (a conservative estimate as some areas report reductions as high as 80%) in low‐ and middle‐income countries due to service restrictions because of coronavirus could result in “49 million women with an unmet need for modern contraceptives and an additional 15 million unintended pregnancies over the course of a year” 15 .…”
Section: Providing Access To Sexual Reproductive and Family Planninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to recognize the importance of access to reproductive care for all of our patients, given the significant impact of pregnancy on systemic rheumatic diseases. As such, we should consider joining with other medical associations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association, to advocate in support of continued access to abortion as an essential health service and not as a political issue (). We must fight to ensure that all of our patients, regardless of race/ethnicity, immigration status, income level, employment status, and insurance status, are able to access their medications and timely, high‐quality, essential care.…”
Section: Collect and Release Sociodemographic Data In Both The Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%