2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboriginal stone-walled intertidal fishtrap morphology, function and chronology investigated with high-resolution close-range Unmanned Aerial Vehicle photogrammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…fishtraps (Kreij et al 2018). All of these are durable features which may have a higher chance of withstanding the destructive effects of wave action and shallow-water currents during sea-level rise, and are of appropriate scale to be observable using remote sensing technology.…”
Section: Regional Archaeological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fishtraps (Kreij et al 2018). All of these are durable features which may have a higher chance of withstanding the destructive effects of wave action and shallow-water currents during sea-level rise, and are of appropriate scale to be observable using remote sensing technology.…”
Section: Regional Archaeological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar workflows, integrating analysis of satellite imagery and DEMs, were used to understand damage caused by off-road vehicles on features as famous as the Nasca lines (Hesse 2015). On a smaller scale, Kreij and others (2018) studied Australian fish traps, modeling their filling patterns to determine their antiquity.…”
Section: Aerial Photogrammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent rise in sophisticated photogrammetry algorithms, commonly available software, combined with the increase in computer processing power have had a strong impact on coastal and shallow water archaeology (e.g. Kreij et al 2018;McCarthy and Benjamin 2018). Recording for 3D has become an important part of the maritime archaeological process, both technically and experientially, as 3D recording has the potential to bridge the gap between terres-trial and underwater archaeology.…”
Section: Technical Challenges: Shallow Water and Intertidal Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%